Urology
Volume 75, Issue 6 , Pages 1294-1298 , June 2010

Twenty-four Hour and Spot Urine Metabolic Evaluations: Correlations Versus Agreements

  • Yet Hoi Hong

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Yet Hoi Hong, M.B.B.S., MMedSc, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • ,
  • Norman Dublin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery (Division of Urology), Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • ,
  • Azad Hassan Razack

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery (Division of Urology), Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • ,
  • Mustafa Ali Mohd

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • ,
  • Ruby Husain

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Received 26 May 2009 ,Accepted 26 August 2009.

References 

  1. Hesse A, Straub M. Rational evaluation of urinary stone disease. Urol Res. 2006;34:126–130
  2. Park S. Medical management of urinary stone disease. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2007;8:1117–1125
  3. Straub M, Strohmaier WL, Berg W, et al. Diagnosis and metaphylaxis of stone disease (Consensus concept of the National Working Committee on Stone Disease for the upcoming German Urolithiasis Guideline). World J Urol. 2005;23:309–323
  4. Tiselius HG. Risk formulas in calcium oxalate urolithiasis. World J Urol. 1997;15:176–185
  5. Ogawa Y, Yonou H, Hokama S, et al. Urinary saturation and risk factors for calcium oxalate stone disease based on spot and 24-hour urine specimens. Front Biosci. 2003;8:a167–a176
  6. Tiselius HG. Patients' attitudes on how to deal with the risk of future stone recurrences. Urol Res. 2006;34:255–260
  7. Pak CY, Peterson R, Poindexter JR. Adequacy of a single stone risk analysis in the medical evaluation of urolithiasis. J Urol. 2001;165:378–381
  8. Parks JH, Goldfisher E, Asplin JR, et al. A single 24-hour urine collection is inadequate for the medical evaluation of nephrolithiasis. J Urol. 2002;167:1607–1612
  9. Gokce C, Gokce O, Baydinc C, et al. Use of random urine samples to estimate total urinary calcium and phosphate excretion. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:1587–1588
  10. Matsushita K, Tanikawa K. Significance of the calcium to creatinine concentration ratio of a single-voided urine specimen in patients with hypercalciuric urolithiasis. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 1987;12:167–171
  11. Berg C, Larsson L, Tiselius HG. The composition of four-hour urine samples from patients with calcium oxalate stone disease. Br J Urol. 1987;60:301–306
  12. Ginsberg JM, Chang BS, Matarese RA, et al. Use of single voided urine samples to estimate quantitative proteinuria. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:1543–1546
  13. Pak CY, Odvina CV, Pearle MS, et al. Effect of dietary modification on urinary stone risk factors. Kidney Int. 2005;68:2264–2273
  14. Ferraz RR, Baxmann AC, Ferreira LG, et al. Preservation of urine samples for metabolic evaluation of stone-forming patients. Urol Res. 2006;34:329–337
  15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310
  16. Vahlensieck EW, Bach D, Hesse A. Circadian rhythm of lithogenic substances in the urine. Urol Res. 1982;10:195–203
  17. Ahlstrand C, Larsson L, Tiselius HG. Variations in urine composition during the day in patients with calcium oxalate stone disease. J Urol. 1984;131:77–81
  18. Robert M, Roux JO, Bourelly F, et al. Circadian variations in the risk of urinary calcium oxalate stone formation. Br J Urol. 1994;74:294–297
  19. Holmes RP, Ambrosius WT, Assimos DG. Dietary oxalate loads and renal oxalate handling. J Urol. 2005;174:943–947

 This project was funded under the University of Malaya Research Grant (Vote-F: FS 154/2007C), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

PII: S0090-4295(09)02475-3

doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.061

Urology
Volume 75, Issue 6 , Pages 1294-1298 , June 2010