Urology
Volume 75, Issue 1 , Pages 118-124, January 2010

A Critical Appraisal of the Value of Lymph Node Dissection at Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

  • Giovanni Lughezzani

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Prognosis and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Claudio Jeldres

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Prognosis and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Hendrik Isbarn

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Prognosis and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Martini-clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • ,
  • Shahrokh F. Shariat

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Prognosis and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Maxine Sun

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Prognosis and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Daniel Pharand

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Hugues Widmer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Philippe Arjane

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Markus Graefen

      Affiliations

    • Martini-clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • ,
  • Francesco Montorsi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Paul Perrotte

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Pierre I. Karakiewicz

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Prognosis and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Department of Urology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Pierre I. Karakiewicz, M.D., F.R.C.S.C., Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center (CHUM), 1058 rue St-Denis, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H2X 3J4

Received 23 May 2009; accepted 9 July 2009. published online 28 October 2009.

Objectives

To perform a population-based analysis of the potential staging or prognostic value (or both) of lymph node dissection (LND) in patients without nodal metastases vs no LND. In several previous reports, LND in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with nephroureterectomy (NU) was associated with better survival relative to no LND (pNx), even in the absence of pathologically confirmed nodal metastases (pN0).

Methods

Within the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database, we identified 2824 patients treated with NU for UTUC between 1988 and 2004. CSM rates after NU were graphically explored using Kaplan–Meier plots. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models tested the effect of N0 vs Nx stage on CSM, after adjusting for T stage, tumor grade, age, gender, primary tumor location, type, and year of surgery.

Results

The CSM-free survival rate at 5 years after NU was 81.2% and 77.8% respectively for pN0 and pNx patients. In univariable analyses pNx vs pN0 status was not associated with worse survival (HR: 1.19; P = .09). After adjustment for all covariates, pNx vs pN0 status still failed to achieve independent predictor status (HR: 0.99; P = .9).

Conclusions

We found no survival benefit related to the performance of LND in pN0 patients, relative to pNx patients. Lack of standardized criteria for patients' selection for LND and for pathological lymph node specimen evaluation represents some of the explanation for the observed discrepancy between the current finding and previous findings.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Dr. Pierre I. Karakiewicz is partially supported by the University of Montreal Urology Associates, Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec, the University of Montreal Department of Surgery and the University of Montreal Foundation.

PII: S0090-4295(09)02419-4

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.07.1296

Refers to article:

  • Editorial Comment

    Oscar Eduardo Fugita
    Urology January 2010 (Vol. 75, Issue 1, Pages 124-125)

  • Reply

    Giovanni Lughezzani, Lars Budäus, Maxine Sun, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Giovanni Lughezzani
    Urology January 2010 (Vol. 75, Issue 1, Page 125)

Urology
Volume 75, Issue 1 , Pages 118-124, January 2010