Journal Home
Search for

Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages 112-116 (January 2010)


View previous. 33 of 78 View next.

Longer Time to Peak Flow Predicts Better Arterial Flow Parameters on Penile Doppler Ultrasound

Wayland Hsiao, Adam B. Shrewsberry, Kelvin A. Moses, Donald Pham, Chad W.M. RitenourCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 11 March 2009; accepted 30 May 2009. published online 20 November 2009.

Refers to article:
Editorial Comment
Ronald W. Lewis
Urology
January 2010 (Vol. 75, Issue 1, Pages 116-117)
Full Text | Full-Text PDF (103 KB)
Reply
Chad W.M. Ritenour
Urology
January 2010 (Vol. 75, Issue 1, Page 117)
Full Text | Full-Text PDF (65 KB)
Objectives

To review the associations between measured variables in Penile Doppler ultrasound procedures. Penile Doppler ultrasound is useful in the evaluation of erectile dysfunction, but there is no uniform standard of performing the procedure. It is generally believed that a peak systolic velocity > 30 cm/s, minimal venous leak, and resistive index > 0.8 are essential for adequate erection. While the arterial parameters are well studied, data on the predictive value of time to peak flow are lacking.

Methods

Penile duplex Doppler ultrasounds performed for either erectile dysfunction or Peyronie's disease evaluation were reviewed. Clinical records, International Index of Erectile Function scores, and ultrasound variables were examined. “Fast” responders reached maximal peak systolic velocity (PSV) ≤ 10 minutes, whereas “slow” responders reached maximal PSV between 15 and 25 minutes.

Results

Of 146 total patients, 36 (25%) were fast responders and 110 (75%), slow responders. No preprocedural characteristics, including the Erectile Function domain score of the International Index of Erectile Function, predicted time to peak flow. Compared with the fast responders, slow responders had higher mean PSV (left: 33.9 ± 19.5 vs 25.0 ± 11.7 cm/s, P = .01; and right: 36.4 ± 21.3 vs 25.0 ± 13.3 cm/s, P = .002). There was also a higher percentage of patients with average PSV > 30 cm/s in slow responders (58% vs 36%, P = .02).

Conclusions

There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between slow and fast responders. However, slow responders did seem to have significantly better arterial flow parameters, although penile dimensions, cavernosal artery diameter, Erectile Function domain scores, and subjective rigidity were similar.

Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Chad W. M. Ritenour, M.D., Department of Urology, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road, Clinic Building B, Atlanta, GA 30322

PII: S0090-4295(09)02235-3

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.102


View previous. 33 of 78 View next.