Urology
Volume 74, Issue 5 , Pages 983-987.e3, November 2009

Validation of a Modified National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index to Assess Genitourinary Pain in Both Men and Women

  • J. Quentin Clemens

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: J. Quentin Clemens, M.D., M.S.C.I., Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Taubman Center 3875, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5330
  • ,
  • Elizabeth A. Calhoun

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Policy and Administration, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • Mark S. Litwin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, UCLA School of Medicine and Public Health, Los Angeles, CA
  • ,
  • Mary McNaughton-Collins

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • John W. Kusek

      Affiliations

    • National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD
  • ,
  • Evelyn M. Crowley

      Affiliations

    • Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • J. Richard Landis

      Affiliations

    • Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Urologic Pelvic Pain Collaborative Research Network

Received 4 May 2009; accepted 16 June 2009. published online 05 October 2009.

Objectives

To date, separate condition-specific instruments have been used to assess severity of symptoms, in men and women with urological pain conditions. We developed a single instrument that can be used to assess treatment response in clinical trials and cohort studies that involve both genders.

Methods

We developed the Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI) by modifying and adding questions to the National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index. To assess discriminant validity, concurrent validity, and reliability, we administered the GUPI to 1653 men and 1403 women in a large managed care population. To assess responsiveness, we administered the GUPI to 47 men and women who completed a National Institutes of Health-sponsored trial of pelvic floor physical therapy.

Results

The GUPI discriminated between men with chronic prostatitis or interstitial cystitis, those with other symptomatic conditions (dysuria, frequency, chronic cystitis), and those with none of these diagnoses (P <.05). It also discriminated between women with interstitial cystitis, those with incontinence, and those with none of these diagnoses (P <.05). The GUPI demonstrated good internal consistency within subscale domains, and GUPI scores correlated highly with scores on the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index and Problem Index. The GUPI was highly responsive to change, and the change in score was similar in both male and female responders. A reduction of 7 points robustly predicted being a treatment responder (sensitivity 100%, specificity 76%).

Conclusions

The GUPI is a valid, reliable, and responsive instrument that can be used to assess the degree of symptoms in both men and women with genitourinary pain complaints.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by grant number NIDDK 5U01DK065257.

PII: S0090-4295(09)02200-6

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.078

Refers to article:

  • Editorial Comment

    Anthony J. Schaeffer
    Urology November 2009 (Vol. 74, Issue 5, Pages 987-988)

  • Reply

    J. Quentin Clemens
    Urology November 2009 (Vol. 74, Issue 5, Page 988)

Urology
Volume 74, Issue 5 , Pages 983-987.e3, November 2009