Journal Home
Search for

Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages 983-987.e3 (November 2009)


View previous. 5 of 87 View next.

Validation of a Modified National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index to Assess Genitourinary Pain in Both Men and Women

J. Quentin ClemensaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Elizabeth A. Calhounb, Mark S. Litwinc, Mary McNaughton-Collinsd, John W. Kuseke, Evelyn M. Crowleyf, J. Richard Landisf, Urologic Pelvic Pain Collaborative Research Network

Received 4 May 2009; accepted 16 June 2009. published online 05 October 2009.

Refers to article:
Editorial Comment
Anthony J. Schaeffer
Urology
November 2009 (Vol. 74, Issue 5, Pages 987-988)
Full Text | Full-Text PDF (101 KB)
Reply
J. Quentin Clemens
Urology
November 2009 (Vol. 74, Issue 5, Page 988)
Full Text | Full-Text PDF (83 KB)
Objectives

To date, separate condition-specific instruments have been used to assess severity of symptoms, in men and women with urological pain conditions. We developed a single instrument that can be used to assess treatment response in clinical trials and cohort studies that involve both genders.

Methods

We developed the Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI) by modifying and adding questions to the National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index. To assess discriminant validity, concurrent validity, and reliability, we administered the GUPI to 1653 men and 1403 women in a large managed care population. To assess responsiveness, we administered the GUPI to 47 men and women who completed a National Institutes of Health-sponsored trial of pelvic floor physical therapy.

Results

The GUPI discriminated between men with chronic prostatitis or interstitial cystitis, those with other symptomatic conditions (dysuria, frequency, chronic cystitis), and those with none of these diagnoses (P <.05). It also discriminated between women with interstitial cystitis, those with incontinence, and those with none of these diagnoses (P <.05). The GUPI demonstrated good internal consistency within subscale domains, and GUPI scores correlated highly with scores on the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index and Problem Index. The GUPI was highly responsive to change, and the change in score was similar in both male and female responders. A reduction of 7 points robustly predicted being a treatment responder (sensitivity 100%, specificity 76%).

Conclusions

The GUPI is a valid, reliable, and responsive instrument that can be used to assess the degree of symptoms in both men and women with genitourinary pain complaints.

a Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan

b Department of Health Policy and Administration, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago, IL

c Department of Urology, UCLA School of Medicine and Public Health, Los Angeles, CA

d Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

e National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD

f Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: J. Quentin Clemens, M.D., M.S.C.I., Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Taubman Center 3875, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5330

 This study was supported by grant number NIDDK 5U01DK065257.

PII: S0090-4295(09)02200-6

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.078


View previous. 5 of 87 View next.