Urology
Volume 75, Issue 3 , Pages 695-700 , March 2010

A Randomized Prospective Trial of Primary Versus AlloDerm Closure of Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvest Site for Substitution Urethroplasty

Received 23 February 2009 ,Accepted 14 July 2009.

References 

  1. Burger RA, Muller SC, El-Damanhoury H, et al. The buccal mucosal graft for urethral reconstruction: a preliminary report. J Urol. 1992;147:662–664
  2. Andrich DE, Mundy AR. Urethral strictures and their surgical treatment. BJU Int. 2000;86:571–580
  3. Barbagli G, Palminteri E, Lazzeri M, et al. Long-term outcome of urethroplasty after failed urethrotomy versus primary repair. J Urol. 2001;165:1918–1919
  4. Kellner DS, Fracchia JA, Armenakas NA. Ventral onlay buccal mucosal grafts for anterior urethral strictures: long-term follow-up. J Urol. 2004;171:726–729
  5. Andrich DE, Mundy AR. Substitution urethroplasty with buccal mucosal-free grafts. J Urol. 2001;165:1131–1133
  6. Dublin N, Stewart LH. Oral complications after buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty. BJU Int. 2004;94:867–869
  7. Simonato A, Gregori A, Lissiani A, et al. The tongue as an alternative donor site for graft urethroplasty: a pilot study. J Urol. 2006;175:589–592
  8. Baskin LS, Duckett JW. The use of buccal mucosa in urethral reconstruction. Adv Urol. 1995;8:213–214
  9. Jang TL, Erickson B, Medendorp A, et al. Comparison of donor site intraoral morbidity after mucosal graft harvesting for urethral reconstruction. Urology. 2005;66:716–720
  10. Tolstunov L, Pogrel MA, McAninch JW. Intraoral morbidity following free buccal mucosal graft harvesting for urethroplasty. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;84:480–482
  11. Morey AF, McAninch JW. Technique of harvesting buccal mucosa for urethral reconstruction. J Urol. 1996;155:1696–1697
  12. Eppley BL, Keating M, Rink R. A buccal mucosal harvesting technique for urethral reconstruction. J Urol. 1997;157:1268–1270
  13. Wood DN, Allen SE, Andrich DE, et al. The morbidity of buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty and the effect of nonclosure of the graft harvest site on post-operative pain. J Urol. 2004;172:580–583
  14. Kellner DS, Fracchia JA, Armenakas NA. Preliminary report on use of AlloDerm for closure of intraoral defects after buccal mucosal harvest. Urology. 2007;69:372–374
  15. St. Martin BA, Rourke K. Closure vs non-closure of buccal mucosal graft harvest site: a randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2009;181(suppl):15;[abstract: 39]
  16. Kamp S, Knoll T, Osman M, et al. Donor-site morbidity in buccal mucosa urethroplasty: lower lip or inner cheek?. Br J Urol. 2005;96:619–623
  17. Simonato A, Gregori A, Ambruosi C, et al. Lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral reconstruction. Eur Urol. 2008;54:79–85
  18. Bhargava S, Patterson JM, Inman RD, et al. Tissue-engineered buccal mucosa urethroplasty-clinical outcomes. Eur Urol. 2008;53:1263–1269
  19. Tolstunov L, Pogrel A. The free buccal mucosal graft for urethroplasty. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;82:613–615
  20. Lauer G, Schimming R, Frankenschmidt A. Intraoral wound closure with tissue engineered mucosa: new perspectives for urethra reconstruction with buccal mucosa grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:25–33
  21. Bello TM, Falabell AF, Eaglstein WH. Tissue-engineered skin: current status in wound healing. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2001;2:306–313
  22. Kish KJ, Buinewicz BR, Morris JB. Acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm): new material in the repair of stoma site hernias. Am Surg. 2005;71:1047–1050
  23. Wainwright DJ. Use of an acellular allograft dermal matrix (AlloDerm) in the management of full-thickness burns. Burns. 1995;21:243–248

PII: S0090-4295(09)02198-0

doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.07.1226

Urology
Volume 75, Issue 3 , Pages 695-700 , March 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution