Urology
Volume 74, Issue 5 , Pages 989-992, November 2009

Is There an Adjunctive Role of Tamsulosin to Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Upper Ureteric Stones: Results of an Open Label Randomized Nonplacebo Controlled Study

Department of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Punjab, India

Received 24 April 2009; accepted 10 June 2009.

Objectives

To investigate the role of tamsulosin as an adjunct to management of upper ureteric stones (UUS) with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL).

Methods

In this prospective, randomized, open label study, patients with single UUS (for SWL) were randomly assigned into 2 groups based on whether they received 0.4 mg tamsulosin (group A and B, respectively) during treatment. Repeat SWL was performed at week 1, 3, and 5 after first session. Primary outcome variables were success rate and pain intensity.

Results

A total of 40 patients (20 each group) completed the requisite follow-up. Success rate was higher in group A after 1 SWL-session (55% vs 25%, respectively; P = .05). There was an insignificant trend of decreased number of days (30.7 ± 19.7 vs 39.0 ± 19.9; P = .19), number of SWL sessions (1.6 vs 2.0; P = .10), and pain experienced (score on visual analog scale, 25.3 ± 17.9 vs 38.3 ± 28.0, respectively; P = .41) in group A. Three in group A and 6 in B developed steinstrasse (P = .69). Overall, 1 in group A required auxiliary procedures as compared with 3 in control group (P = .60).

Conclusions

Tamsulosin improves clearance rate of UUS after single SWL. However, it does not provide significant advantage in terms of decreasing pain associated with this treatment.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(09)02194-3

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.075

Refers to article:

  • Editorial Comment

    Abhay Rane
    Urology November 2009 (Vol. 74, Issue 5, Page 993)

  • Reply

    Mayank Mohan Agarwal, Arup K. Mandal, Shrawan K. Singh
    Urology November 2009 (Vol. 74, Issue 5, Page 993)

Urology
Volume 74, Issue 5 , Pages 989-992, November 2009