Urology
Volume 75, Issue 1 , Pages 148-152, January 2010

Poorly Numerate Patients in an Inner City Hospital Misunderstand the American Urological Association Symptom Score

  • Viraj A. Master

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Viraj A. Master, M.D., Ph.D., F.A.C.S., Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1365 Clifton road, NE, Atlanta, GA 30 322, 404-217-6419
  • ,
  • Timothy V. Johnson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
  • ,
  • Ammara Abbasi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
  • ,
  • Samantha S. Ehrlich

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
  • ,
  • Renee S. Kleris

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
  • ,
  • Sundus Abbasi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
  • ,
  • Adam Prater

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
  • ,
  • Ashli Owen-Smith

      Affiliations

    • Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia
  • ,
  • Michael Goodman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia

Received 12 May 2009; accepted 25 June 2009. published online 12 October 2009.

Objectives

To hypothesize that numeracy may also predict patient misunderstanding of the American Urological Association symptom score (AUA-SS). Health literacy consists of document and prose literacy, both considered “traditional” literacy. But, health literacy also comprises quantitative literacy or numeracy. We previously reported that document literacy independently predicts misunderstanding of the AUA-SS. However, the AUA-SS consists of written and numeric information.

Methods

Prospective cohort study of male patients who completed a validated, 3-question numeracy test once and the AUA-SS twice, which were self-administered and then interviewer-assisted. These 2 responses were compared with assessed patient understanding of the AUA-SS. Multivariate logistic regression analyses examined the association between patient characteristics and poor understanding of the symptom score, defined as understanding fewer than half of the questions, by calculating the odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals.

Results

A total of 571 patients completed the study, with an average age and education level of 58 and 13.5 years, respectively. On the numeracy test, 16%, 18%, 35%, and 31% correctly answered 3, 2, 1, and 0 questions, respectively. After adjusting for the highest educational level completed, written literacy, and demographics, completely innumerate respondents (score = 0 points) were more than 3 times as likely (odds ratio = 3.55; 95% confidence interval: 1.58-7.99; P = .002) to misrepresent their AUA-SS compared with those who had some numeracy (1-3 points).

Conclusions

Regardless of educational or literacy status, a significant number of patients self-report AUA-SS scores that are different from interviewer-assisted scores, which may severely limit their access to appropriate care.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(09)00939-X

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.060

Urology
Volume 75, Issue 1 , Pages 148-152, January 2010