Journal Home
Search for

Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages 1008-1012 (November 2009)


View previous. 14 of 87 View next.

Single-port Laparoscopic Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy: Initial Experience and Comparative Outcomes

Wesley M. White, Raj K. Goel, Mia A. Swartz, Courtenay Moore, Raymond R. Rackley, Jihad H. KaoukCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 21 October 2008; accepted 19 February 2009. published online 31 August 2009.

Refers to article:
Editorial Comment
Michael C. Truss
Urology
November 2009 (Vol. 74, Issue 5, Page 1012)
Full Text | Full-Text PDF (84 KB)
Reply
Jihad H. Kaouk
Urology
November 2009 (Vol. 74, Issue 5, Page 1012)
Full Text | Full-Text PDF (84 KB)
Objectives

To determine the efficacy and safety of single-port laparoscopic abdominal sacral colpopexy (ASC) for the treatment of female pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed to assess perioperative outcomes among women who were treated for symptomatic POP with laparoscopic, robotic, or single-port laparoscopic ASC. All patients underwent preoperative history and physical examination including POP quantification (POP-Q) staging and urodynamics. ASC with or without anti-incontinence surgery was performed via the aforementioned approaches. Demographic and perioperative data were obtained. Patients were followed up postoperatively at 3 and 6 months with POP-Q evaluation. Statistical analysis was performed.

Results

From October 2005 to July 2008, 30 female patients with symptomatic Stage II (6 patients), Stage III (23 patients), or Stage IV (1 patient) POP were treated with laparoscopic (10), robotic (10), or single-port laparoscopic (10) ASC. Mean age of the entire cohort was 61.1 years. Mean body mass index was 26.7 kg/m2. Seventeen patients demonstrated stress urinary incontinence and underwent concomitant sling placement. No intraoperative complications were encountered. No significant difference was noted in the 3 cohorts with respect to operative time, blood loss, mean visual analog pain score at discharge, or duration of hospitalization. At 6 months following surgery, 27 patients underwent follow-up POP-Q, with all patients demonstrating excellent apical support and prolapse reduction.

Conclusions

Single-port laparoscopic ASC offers comparable efficacy and superior cosmesis compared to alternative approaches. Long-term follow-up is needed to confirm durability of repair.

Sections of Laparoscopic and Robotic Urology and Female Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Jihad H. Kaouk, M.D., Robotic Surgery Center, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Suite A100, Cleveland, OH 44195

PII: S0090-4295(09)00760-2

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.02.086


View previous. 14 of 87 View next.