Urology
Volume 74, Issue 1 , Page 67, July 2009

Why We Did Not Use Left Side for This Donor

  • Hayri Ogul

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Erzurum, Turkey
  • ,
  • Mahmut Bozkurt

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Numune Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey
  • ,
  • Mecit Kantarci

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Erzurum, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Mecit Kantarci, M.D., Department of Radiology, Atatürk University Medical Faculty, 200 Evler Mah, 14, Sok 5, Dadaskent, Erzurum, Turkey

Received 1 December 2008; accepted 12 January 2009. published online 10 April 2009.

We describe a case of an unusual variation of the double retroaortic left renal vein discovered during routine donor examination of the abdomen by multidetector computed tomography. A 53-year-old man underwent evaluation in our department as a potential renal donor for his brother who had end-stage renal failure. Multidetector computed tomography angiography showed double retroaortic left renal veins. This can increase the potential for serious morbidity and mortality in the donor. We prefer right kidney for potential donation. Multidetector computed tomography is the method of choice in the evaluation of renal donation.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(09)00161-7

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.01.050

Refers to article:

Urology
Volume 74, Issue 1 , Page 67, July 2009