Urology
Volume 74, Issue 1 , Pages 56-60, July 2009

Epidemiology of Nephrolithiasis in Personnel Returning From Operation Iraqi Freedom

  • Jennifer M. Pugliese

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Jennifer M. Pugliese, M.D., Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA 98431
  • ,
  • Karen C. Baker

Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington

Received 30 June 2008; accepted 24 October 2008. published online 23 April 2009.

Objectives

To examine the epidemiology of urolithiasis in personnel returning from deployment to Southwest Asia.

Methods

A survey-based study of personnel returning from deployment to Southwest Asia was performed. The demographics were compared between the personnel reporting a history of urolithiasis during or within the first 90 days of returning from deployment and the personnel without a history of reported urolithiasis.

Results

A total of 10,180 personnel were demobilized and 6153 surveys were received during a 9-month period, for a survey response rate of 60%. Of the personnel returning survey, 1% reported urolithiasis during their deployment. The personnel who reported urolithiasis were slightly older than those who did not (32.6 vs 29 years old, P < .00038). The odds of reporting urolithiasis during deployment were 30.9 times greater for personnel with a history of stone disease and 2.4 times greater for those with a family history of stone disease. No difference was found in the rates of urolithiasis with regard to sex or race. Also, no strong evidence for an association between the rates of reported urolithiasis and seasonal variations in temperature in Southwest Asia was found.

Conclusions

The rate of reported urolithiasis among deployed personnel was lower than that in the general population. The personnel who reported urolithiasis during deployment were slightly older. A personal history or family history of stone disease was significant predictors of urolithiasis in this deployed population.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Army, Department of Defense or the United States Government.

PII: S0090-4295(09)00127-7

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.079

Refers to article:

  • Editorial Comment

    David Schulsinger
    Urology July 2009 (Vol. 74, Issue 1, Page 60)

  • Reply

    Jennifer M. Pugliese, Karen C. Baker
    Urology July 2009 (Vol. 74, Issue 1, Pages 60-61)

Urology
Volume 74, Issue 1 , Pages 56-60, July 2009