Urology
Volume 76, Issue 1 , Pages 39-42, July 2010

Evaluation of Need for Salvage Continence Procedures After Failed Modern Staged Repair

Department of Pediatric Urology, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Received 28 August 2008; accepted 6 November 2008. published online 10 May 2010.

Objectives

To assess our experience with salvage continence procedures in patients with bladder exstrophy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed our surgical records of patients with bladder exstrophy who had undergone failed modern staged repair elsewhere and underwent salvage continence operations at our institute from 1996 to 2008.

Results

A total of 16 patients had undergone salvage continence operations. Bladder augmentation was performed in 11 patients (68.8%); 14 children (87.5%) received a continent, catheterizable stoma. In 6 children (37.5%) bladder neck injections were done. Three patients (18.8%) underwent bladder neck closure combined with other reconstructive procedures. A total of 49 continence procedures were performed, with an average of 3.06 per patient. We included all 16 children >5 years. After these operations, 13 of 16 (81.3%) became continent. Two children were able to void spontaneously and were dry day and night (12.5%). Of the remaining 14 patients, all of whom used clean intermittent catheterization, 11 (68.7%) were continent during the day and night with augmentation and/or a catheterizable stoma. Three patients were incontinent (18.7%).

Conclusions

Although the need to perform salvage continence procedures after failed bladder modern staged repair is high, when patients are appropriately selected, continence can be achieved eventually.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(08)01891-8

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.11.017

Urology
Volume 76, Issue 1 , Pages 39-42, July 2010