Urology
Volume 74, Issue 1 , Pages 77-81, July 2009

Comparative Analysis of Pain During Anesthesia and No-scalpel Vasectomy Procedure Among Three Different Local Anesthetic Techniques

  • Himanshu Aggarwal

      Affiliations

    • Division of Urology, Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
    • Division of Urology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
    • Division of Urology, Department of Veterans Affairs, Omaha, Nebraska
    • Western Iowa Healthcare System, Midwest Urology Associates and Urology Specialists, Immanuel Plaza West, Omaha, Nebraska
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Himanshu Aggarwal, M.D., Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 405 Dovershire Parkway, Durham, NC 27704
  • ,
  • Rei K. Chiou

      Affiliations

    • Division of Urology, Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
    • Division of Urology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
    • Division of Urology, Department of Veterans Affairs, Omaha, Nebraska
    • Western Iowa Healthcare System, Midwest Urology Associates and Urology Specialists, Immanuel Plaza West, Omaha, Nebraska
  • ,
  • Larry E. Siref

      Affiliations

    • Division of Urology, Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
    • Division of Urology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
    • Division of Urology, Department of Veterans Affairs, Omaha, Nebraska
    • Western Iowa Healthcare System, Midwest Urology Associates and Urology Specialists, Immanuel Plaza West, Omaha, Nebraska
  • ,
  • Stewart E. Sloan

      Affiliations

    • Division of Urology, Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
    • Division of Urology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
    • Division of Urology, Department of Veterans Affairs, Omaha, Nebraska
    • Western Iowa Healthcare System, Midwest Urology Associates and Urology Specialists, Immanuel Plaza West, Omaha, Nebraska

Received 5 October 2008; accepted 15 November 2008. published online 11 May 2009.

Objectives

To compare the pain during anesthesia and during the no-scalpel vasectomy procedure for local infiltration anesthesia (LIA), LIA supplemented with spermatic cord block (LIA + SCB), and no needle jet anesthesia.

Methods

Bilateral no-scalpel vasectomy was performed in 323 patients during 2007. Of the 323 patients, 65 received LIA, 29 received LIA + SCB, and 227 received anesthesia using the no-needle technique with the MadaJet device. The level of pain during anesthesia administration and the subsequent procedural pain was documented for each technique using a pain scale of 0-10.

Results

Pain during the LIA + SCB procedure (mean 1.7 ± 1.6) was significantly less than the pain during LIA (mean 3.3 ± 2.3; P < .01). No statistically significant difference was found between the levels of pain experienced during LIA + SCB and no-needle jet anesthesia (P >> .01 and P >> .05, respectively). Intraoperative pain after LIA + SCB (mean 0.64 ± 1.2) was significantly less than the intraoperative pain after LIA (mean 2.7 ± 2.6; P <<< .01). Also, the intraoperative pain after LIA + SCB was significantly less than the intraoperative pain after no-needle jet anesthesia (mean 2.13 ± 2.0; P <<< .01).

Conclusion

LIA + SCB is an effective and better method of anesthesia compared with LIA alone or no-needle jet anesthesia for reducing the pain during vasectomy. Also, no difference was found in the pain levels during anesthesia for the LIA + SCB, LIA, and no-needle anesthesia techniques.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(08)01885-2

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.11.023

Urology
Volume 74, Issue 1 , Pages 77-81, July 2009