Urology
Volume 73, Issue 2 , Pages 377-379 , February 2009

Intraoperative Ultrasound: Application in Pediatric Pyeloplasty

  • Van Anh T. Ginger

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Van Anh T. Ginger, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 Northeast Pacific Street, Campus Box 356510, Seattle, WA 98195
    • ,
  • Thomas S. Lendvay

      Affiliations

    • Division of Pediatric Urology, Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, Washington

Received 22 July 2008 ,Accepted 18 August 2008.

References 

  1. Woo HH, Farnsworth RH. Dismembered pyeloplasty in infants under the age of 12 months. Br J Urol. 1996;77:449–451
  2. McMullin N, Khor T, King P. Internal ureteric stenting following pyeloplasty reduces length of hospital stay in children. Br J Urol. 1993;72:370–372
  3. Mandhani A, Goel S, Bhandari M. Is antegrade stenting superior to retrograde stenting in laparoscopic pyeloplasty?. J Urol. 2004;171:1440–1442
  4. Arumainayagam N, Minervini A, Davenport K, et al. Antegrade versus retrograde stenting in laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 2008;22:671–674
  5. Chandrasekharam VV. Is retrograde stenting more reliable than antegrade stenting for pyeloplasty in infants and children?. Urology. 2005;66:1301–1304
  6. Palmer JS, Palmer LS. Determining the proper stent length to use in children: age plus 10. J Urol. 2007;178:1566–1569

PII: S0090-4295(08)01613-0

doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.507

Urology
Volume 73, Issue 2 , Pages 377-379 , February 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution