Urology
Volume 73, Issue 2 , Pages 356-361, February 2009

Absence of Relationship Between Steroid Hormone Levels and Prostate Cancer Tumor Grade

This study was first presented at the 2008 American Society for Clinical Oncology Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, February 14-16, 2008, San Francisco, California.

  • David J. Sher

      Affiliations

    • Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Christos Mantzoros

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Susanna Jacobus

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Meredith M. Regan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Gwo-Shu Lee

      Affiliations

    • Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • William K. Oh

      Affiliations

    • Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: William K. Oh, M.D., Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, Boston, MA 02115

Received 19 April 2008; accepted 15 July 2008. published online 26 November 2008.

Objectives

To analyze the relationship between plasma testosterone and estradiol levels on prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason scores in a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.

Methods

Patients with prostate cancer evaluated at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from 2001 to 2005 who were enrolled in a prospective sample banking protocol were eligible for this study. Stored plasma was processed for total testosterone, total estradiol, and sex hormone-binding globulin levels using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The frequency of high-grade biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason scores (>6) was the primary endpoint. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between the hormone levels and high-grade Gleason scores while adjusting for sex hormone-binding globulin, age, body mass index, and prostate-specific antigen.

Results

A total of 539 patients were included in this study, 199 of whom underwent radical prostatectomy. The median prostate-specific antigen level was 5.1 ng/dL, and 67% of the cancers were not palpable. The Gleason score was 2-6, 7, and 8-10 in 53%, 37%, and 10% of the cancers, respectively. On univariate analysis of the high-grade biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score, the total testosterone, total estradiol, and estradiol-to-testosterone ratio were not significant as continuous or categorical variables. Adjusting these results for sex hormone-binding globulin level, body mass index, age, and prostate-specific antigen level did not change the conclusions, and these results were unchanged when categorizing high-grade prostate cancer as Gleason score 8-10.

Conclusions

No relationship was found between the circulating steroid hormone levels and the Gleason score in this cohort.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by the Bing Sound Wong Fund for Prostate Cancer Research and Louis DiGiovanni Fund (both to W. K. Oh).

PII: S0090-4295(08)01562-8

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.07.068

Refers to article:

  • Editorial Comment

    Susan F. Slovin
    Urology February 2009 (Vol. 73, Issue 2, Pages 361-362)

  • Reply

    David J. Sher, William K. Oh
    Urology February 2009 (Vol. 73, Issue 2, Page 362)

Urology
Volume 73, Issue 2 , Pages 356-361, February 2009