« Previous
Next »
Urology
Volume 73, Issue 2
, Pages 237-240
, February 2009
Effect of Flexible Cystoscopy on Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Values
References
- Benefits and harm of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: An Evidence Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:192–199
- . Cancer facts and figures. http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF2007PWSecured.pdf2007;10
- . Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) best practice policy. Oncology. 2000;14:267–272
- The effect of digital rectal examination, flexible cystoscopy, and prostatic biopsy on free and total prostate specific antigen, and the free-to-total prostate specific antigen ration in clinical practice. J Urol. 1997;157:1744–1747
- Effect of digital rectal examination and flexible cystoscopy on free and total prostate-specific antigen, and the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen. Eur Urol. 1998;33:255–260
- Effect of cystoscopy, prostate biopsy, and transurethral resection of prostate on serum prostate-specific antigen concentration. Urology. 1993;42:276–282
- Influence of investigative and operative procedures on serum prostate-specific antigen concentration. Ann Clin Biochem. 1999;36:340–346
- . Prostatic manipulation has a minimal effect on complexed prostate-specific antigen levels. Br J Urol. 2000;86:65–67
- Influence of digital rectal examination, cystoscopy, transrectal ultrasonography, and needle biopsy on the concentration of prostate-specific antigen. Urol Int. 1994;53:186–190
- . Effect of digital rectal examination on serum prostate-specific antigen in a primary care setting. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:389–392
- . Digital rectal examination-associated alterations in serum prostate-specific antigen. Am J Clin Pathol. 1992;97:528–534
The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.
PII: S0090-4295(08)01556-2
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.011
« Previous
Next »
Urology
Volume 73, Issue 2
, Pages 237-240
, February 2009
