Journal Home
Search for

Volume 72, Issue 1, Pages 42-46 (July 2008)


View previous. 15 of 70 View next.

Flexible Robotic Retrograde Renoscopy: Description of Novel Robotic Device and Preliminary Laboratory Experience

Mihir M. DesaiabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Monish Aronab, Inderbir S. Gillab, Georges Pascal-Haberab, Osamu Ukimuraab, Jihad H. Kaoukab, Gregory Stahlerc, Federico Barbaglic, Christopher Carlsonc, Fredric Mollc

Received 25 October 2007; accepted 4 January 2008. published online 27 March 2008.

Objectives

To describe a novel flexible robotic system for performing retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Methods

Remote robotic flexible ureterorenoscopy was performed bilaterally in 5 acute swine (10 kidneys). A novel 14F robotic catheter system, which manipulated a passive optical fiberscope mounted on a remote catheter manipulator was used. The technical feasibility, efficiency, and reproducibility of accessing all calices were assessed. Additionally, laser lithotripsy of calculi and laser ablation of renal papillae were performed.

Results

The robotic catheter system could be introduced de novo in eight ureters; two ureters required balloon dilation. The ureteroscope could be successfully manipulated remotely into 83 (98%) of the 85 calices. The time required to inspect all calices within a given kidney decreased with experience from 15 minutes in the first kidney to 49 seconds in the last (mean 4.6 minutes). On a visual analog scale (1, worst to 10, best), the reproducibility of caliceal access was rated at 8, and instrument tip stability was rated at 10. A renal pelvic perforation constituted the solitary complication. Histologic examination of the ureter showed changes consistent with acute dilation without areas of necrosis.

Conclusions

A novel robotic catheter system is described for performing retrograde ureterorenoscopy. The potential advantages compared with conventional manual flexible ureterorenoscopy include an increased range of motion, instrument stability, and improved ergonomics. Ongoing refinement is likely to expand the role of this technology in retrograde intrarenal surgery in the near future.

a Section of Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery, Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

b Section of Endourology and Stone Disease, Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

c Hansen Medical, Mountain View, California

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Mihir M. Desai, M.D., Sections of Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery and Section of Endourology and Stone Disease, Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A100, Cleveland, OH 44195.

 M. M. Desai is a consultant and stockholder in Hansen Medical; I. S. Gill is a consultant to, and stockholder in, Hansen Medical; and F. Moll, G. Stahler, C. Carlson, and C. Barbagli are employees of Hansen Medical, Mountain View, California.

 This study was funded by Hansen Medical, Mountain View, California.

PII: S0090-4295(08)00225-2

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.01.076


View previous. 15 of 70 View next.