Urology
Volume 72, Issue 1 , Pages 47-50, July 2008

Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation with Psoas Hitch: A Multi-institutional, Multinational Evaluation

  • Nilesh N. Patil

      Affiliations

    • Center for Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Nilesh N. Patil, M.D., Ohio State University, Center for Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 538 Doan Hall, 410 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210.
  • ,
  • Alexandre Mottrie

      Affiliations

    • Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
  • ,
  • Bala Sundaram

      Affiliations

    • Hospital Sultanah Aminah, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • ,
  • Vipul R. Patel

      Affiliations

    • Center for Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

Received 8 October 2007; accepted 3 December 2007. published online 02 April 2008.

Objectives

To report the collective experience of three multinational institutions with the use of robotics to evaluate and treat complex distal ureteral obstruction.

Methods

A total of 12 patients from The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; and Hospital Sultanah Aminah, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation between August 2004 and July 2006. The indications for ureteral reimplantation included ureteral stricture (n = 10) and ureterovaginal fistula (n = 2). Nine patients had pathology on the left side and 4 patients had right-sided disease. Surgery was performed by three experienced laparoscopic robotic surgeons with the daVinci Surgical System.

Results

The mean patient age (range) was 41.3 years (19 to 67 years). The mean operative time was 208 minutes (80 to 360 minutes). The mean robot time was 173 minutes (75 to 300 minutes). The mean estimated blood loss was 48 mL (45 to 100 minutes). The mean length of hospitalization was 4.3 days (2 to 8 days). All the procedures were completed successfully robotically without open conversion. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Postoperative intravenous urography and Mercapto Acetyl TriGlycine 3 showed normal findings in 10 patients and a mild residual hydronephrosis in 2 patients. After a mean follow-up of 15.5 months, all patients were asymptomatic of their initial disease state.

Conclusions

This multi-institutional, multinational experience illustrates that ureteral reimplantation with psoas hitch can be performed safely and effectively to treat lower tract ureteral obstruction.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(08)00130-1

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.097

Urology
Volume 72, Issue 1 , Pages 47-50, July 2008