Urology
Volume 71, Issue 5 , Pages 776-780, May 2008

Costs of Interstitial Cystitis in a Managed Care Population

  • J. Quentin Clemens

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: J. Quentin Clemens, M.D., M.S.C.I., Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 303 East Chicago Avenue, Tarry 11-715, Chicago, IL 60611.
  • ,
  • Richard T. Meenan

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Division, Portland, Oregon
  • ,
  • Maureen C. O'Keeffe Rosetti

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Division, Portland, Oregon
  • ,
  • Terry Kimes

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Division, Portland, Oregon
  • ,
  • Elizabeth A. Calhoun

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Policy Administration, University of Illinois School of Public Health, Chicago, Illinois

Received 31 January 2007; accepted 2 November 2007. published online 10 March 2008.

Objectives

To assess the direct medical costs, medication, and procedure use associated with interstitial cystitis (IC) in women in the Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) managed care population.

Methods

The KPNW electronic medical record was used to identify women diagnosed with IC (n = 239). Each of these patients was matched with three controls according to age and duration in the health plan. Health plan cost accounting data were used to determine the inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy costs for 1998 to 2003. An analysis of the prescription medication use and cystoscopic and urodynamic procedures commonly associated with IC was also performed. To evaluate for co-morbidities, an automated risk-adjustment model linked to 28 chronic medical conditions was applied to the administrative data sets from both groups.

Results

The mean duration from the date of IC diagnosis to the end of the study period was 36.6 months (range 1.4 to 60). The mean yearly costs were 2.4-fold greater for the patients than for the controls ($7100 versus $2994), and the median yearly costs were 3.8-fold greater ($5000 versus $1304). These cost differences were predominantly due to outpatient and pharmacy expenses. Medication and procedure use were significantly greater for the patients than for the controls. These findings were consistent across risk-adjustment model categories, which suggest that the observed cost differences are IC specific.

Conclusions

The direct per-person costs of IC are high, with average yearly costs approximately $4000 greater than for the age-matched controls. This cost differential is an underestimate, because the costs preceding the diagnosis, the use of alternative therapies, indirect costs, and the costs of those with IC that is not diagnosed were not included.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by National Institute of Arthritis, Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases grant U01 DK060177-02.

PII: S0090-4295(07)02628-3

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.154

Urology
Volume 71, Issue 5 , Pages 776-780, May 2008