Urology
Volume 72, Issue 3 , Pages 628-632 , September 2008

Prognostic Significance of High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia (HGPIN): Risk of Prostatic Cancer on Repeat Biopsies

  • Fabrizio Gallo

      Affiliations

    • Division of Urology, San Paolo Hospital, Savona, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Fabrizio Gallo, M.D., Division of Urology, San Paolo Hospital, Via Genova, 38, 17100 Savona, Italy
    • ,
  • Luciano Chiono

      Affiliations

    • Division of Urology, San Paolo Hospital, Savona, Italy
    • ,
  • Emilio Gastaldi

      Affiliations

    • Division of Urology, San Paolo Hospital, Savona, Italy
    • ,
  • Ezio Venturino

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, San Paolo Hospital, Savona, Italy
    • ,
  • Claudio Giberti

      Affiliations

    • Division of Urology, San Paolo Hospital, Savona, Italy

Received 23 September 2007 ,Accepted 27 November 2007.

References 

  1. Bostwick DG, Montironi R. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and the origins of prostatic carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract. 1995;191:828–830
  2. Gokden N, Roehl K, Catalona WJ, et al. High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in needle biopsy as risk factor for detection of adenocarcinoma: current level of risk in screening population. Urology. 2005;65:538–542
  3. Bishara T, Ramnani DM, Epstein JI. High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on needle biopsy: risk of cancer on repeat biopsy related to number of involved cores and morphologic pattern. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28:629–633
  4. Girasole CR, Cookson MS, Putzi MJ, et al. Significance of atypical and suspicious small acinar proliferations and high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate biopsy: implications for cancer detection and biopsy strategy. J Urol. 2006;175:929–933
  5. Epstein JI, Herawi M. Prostate needle biopsies containing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma: implications for patient care. J Urol. 2006;175:820–834
  6. Joniau S, Goeman L, Pennings J, et al. Prostatic Intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN): importance and clinical management. Eur Urol. 2005;48:379–385
  7. Eggener Se, Roehl KA, Catalona WJ. Predictors of subsequent prostate cancer in men with a prostate specific antigen of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/mL and an initially negative biopsy. J Urol. 2005;174:500–504
  8. Dovey Z, Corbishley CM, Kirby RS. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a risk factor for prostate cancer. Can J Urol. 2005;12:49–52
  9. Moore CK, Karikehalli S, Nazeer T, et al. Prognostic significance of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation in the contemporary era. J Urol. 2005;173:70–72
  10. Abdel-Khalek M, El-Baz M, Ibrahiem el-H. Predictors of prostate cancer on extended biopsy in patients with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a multivariate analysis model. BJU Int. 2004;94:528–533
  11. Roscigno M, Scattoni V, Freschi M, et al. Monofocal and plurifocal high-grade porstatic intraepithelial neoplasia on extended prostate biopsies: factors predicting cancer detection on extended repeat biopsy. Urology. 2004;63:1105–1110
  12. Fowler JE, Bigler SA, Lynch C, et al. Prospective study of correlations between biopsy-detected high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, serum prostate specific antigen concentration and race. Cancer. 2001;91:1291–1296
  13. Lefkowitz GK, Taneja SS, Brown J, et al. Follow-up interval porstate biopsy 3 years after diagnosis of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is associated with high likelihood of prostate cancer, independent of change in prostate specific antigen levels. J Urol. 2002;168:1415–1418
  14. Borboroglu PG, Sur RL, Roberts JL, et al. Repeat biopsy strategy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation or high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on initial prostate needle biopsy. J Urol. 2001;166:866–870
  15. Bostwick DG. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). Urology. 1989;34:16–22
  16. Allam CK, Bostwick DG, Hayes JA, et al. Interobserver variability in the diagnosis of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol. 1996;9:742–751
  17. Reyes AO, Swanson PE, Carbone JM. Unusual histologic types of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997;21:1215–1222
  18. Bostwick DG, Brawer MK. Prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia and early invasion in prostate cancer. Cancer. 1987;59:788–794
  19. Presti JC, Chang JJ, Bhargava V, et al. The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies results of a prospective clinical trial. J Urol. 2000;163:163–164
  20. Bostwick DG, Qian J. High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Mod Pathol. 2004;17:360–363
  21. Joniau S, Goeman L, Roskams T. The effect of chemoprevention on PSA and clinical management in patients with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Eur Urol Suppl. 2004;3:67–68
  22. Bono AV, Mazzucchelli R, Ferrari I. Bicalutamide 50 mg monotherapy in patients with isolated high grade PIN: findings in repeat biopsies at six months. J Clin Patol. 2006;5:21–23
  23. Scattoni V, Montironi R, Mazzuchelli R. Pathological changes of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer after monotherapy with bicalutamide 150 mg. BJU Int. 2006;98:54–58
  24. Slem CE, Cote RJ, Skinner EC. The effect of finasteride on prostate gland peripheral zone histology and proliferation rates in men at high risk for prostate cancer. J Urol. 1997;157:228–232
  25. Van der Kwast TH, Labrie F, Tetu B. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and endocrine manipulation. Eur Urol. 1999;35:508–510
  26. Cheng L, Cheville JC, Pisansky TM. Prevalence and distribution of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in salvage radical prostatectomy specimens after radiation therapy. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999;23:803–808

PII: S0090-4295(07)02506-X

doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.115

Urology
Volume 72, Issue 3 , Pages 628-632 , September 2008

Article Tools