Urology
Volume 71, Issue 5 , Pages 767-770, May 2008

Female Urinary Incontinence and the Construction of Nineteenth-Century Stigmatized Womanhood

  • Tanfer Emin Tunc

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Tanfer Emin Tunc, Ph.D., Hacettepe University, Department of American Culture and Literature, Faculty of Letters, Beyetepe, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of American Culture and Literature, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

Received 22 August 2007; accepted 12 November 2007. published online 15 February 2008.

Before the 20th century, female urinary incontinence was a problematic disease because it presented a medical challenge (it was difficult to treat before the advent of surgical techniques) and prevented women from fulfilling their roles as spouses and caretakers. The latter was particularly troublesome during the 19th century when Western women (ie, white, middle/upper class, Protestant women) were expected to follow rigid, socially constructed gender roles, especially within the private microcosm of the family unit. Incontinent women of childbearing age had no place in the hierarchy of Euro-American society and were thus constructed as impure, polluted, and sexually undesirable. This stigmatization of the incontinent body not only marginalized the medical needs of the suffering woman but also characterized her as an unfeminine, contaminated, and repulsive object to be ostracized and excluded from the social rituals that defined selfhood.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(07)02424-7

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.053

Urology
Volume 71, Issue 5 , Pages 767-770, May 2008