Urology
Volume 71, Issue 5 , Pages 762-765 , May 2008

Urology Residency and Research: Round Table Discussion and Plea for Innovation

  • James Montie

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: James E. Montie, M.D., Chairman, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Taubman Center 3875, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0330.
  • ,
  • Gary Faerber

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • ,
  • Anthony Schaeffer

      Affiliations

    • Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Department of Urology, Chicago, Illinois
  • ,
  • William Steers

      Affiliations

    • The University of Virginia Health System, Department of Urology, Charlottesville, Virginia
  • ,
  • Monica Liebert

      Affiliations

    • Office of Research, American Urological Association Foundation, Linthicum, Maryland
  • ,
  • Doris Stoll

      Affiliations

    • Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois
  • ,
  • Jill Macoska

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Received 22 December 2006 ,Accepted 22 October 2007.

References 

  1. Carroll PR. Modifying urology residency training: time to speed up or slow down?. J Urol. 2006;175:811–812
  2. Carroll PR, Albertson PC, Smith JA, et al. Volume of major surgeries performed by recent and more senior graduates from North American urology training programs. J Urol. 2006;175:1
  3. Goldman E, Marshall E. NIH grantees: where have all the young ones gone?. Science. 2002;298:40–41
  4. Kaiser J. Panel weighs starter RO1 grants. Science. 2004;304:1891
  5. Kotchen TA, Lindquist T, Miller Sostek A, et al. Outcomes of National Institutes of Health peer review of clinical grant applications. J Invest Med. 2006;54:13–19
  6. Rangel SJ, Efron B, Moss RL. Recent trends in National Institutes of Health funding of surgical research. Ann Surg. 2002;236:277–287
  7. Spencer AU, Teitelbaum DH. Impact of work hours on restrictions on residency operative volume on a subspecialty surgical service. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;200:670–676

PII: S0090-4295(07)02291-1

doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.040

Urology
Volume 71, Issue 5 , Pages 762-765 , May 2008