Urology
Volume 71, Issue 5 , Pages 762-765, May 2008

Urology Residency and Research: Round Table Discussion and Plea for Innovation

  • James Montie

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: James E. Montie, M.D., Chairman, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Taubman Center 3875, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0330.
  • ,
  • Gary Faerber

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • ,
  • Anthony Schaeffer

      Affiliations

    • Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Department of Urology, Chicago, Illinois
  • ,
  • William Steers

      Affiliations

    • The University of Virginia Health System, Department of Urology, Charlottesville, Virginia
  • ,
  • Monica Liebert

      Affiliations

    • Office of Research, American Urological Association Foundation, Linthicum, Maryland
  • ,
  • Doris Stoll

      Affiliations

    • Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois
  • ,
  • Jill Macoska

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Received 22 December 2006; accepted 22 October 2007. published online 25 February 2008.

Abstract 

Objectives

To evaluate the current and future states of resident research experience in urology residencies in the United States.

Methods

Round table discussion with leading educators and Urology faculty from a university urology residency.

Results

Research exposure has rapidly diminished in urology residencies for a variety of reasons. There are multiple barriers to resident research and only a small number of residencies will be able to provide protected time. Nevertheless, an understanding of research methodology and biostatistics is required to be a successful clinician.

Conclusions

Some barriers to resident research can be addressed by better integration of residency and fellowships. Flexibility in the format of resident education may allow introduction of new methods to encourage resident research scholarship. An education program with a research curriculum is needed for all residencies.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(07)02291-1

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.040

Urology
Volume 71, Issue 5 , Pages 762-765, May 2008