Urology
Volume 71, Issue 3 , Pages 385-389, March 2008

Prospective Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Angiography with Selective Renal Angiography for Living Kidney Donor Assessment

  • Christopher Neville

      Affiliations

    • Division of Urology, London Health Sciences Centre, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
    • ,
  • Andrew A. House

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nephrology, London Health Sciences Centre, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
    • ,
  • Christopher Y. Nguan

      Affiliations

    • Division of Urology, London Health Sciences Centre, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
    • ,
  • Kenneth A. Beasley

      Affiliations

    • Division of Urology, London Health Sciences Centre, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
    • ,
  • David Peck

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, London Health Sciences Centre, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
    • ,
  • Lisa M.F. Thain

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, London Health Sciences Centre, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
    • ,
  • Richard Rankin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, London Health Sciences Centre, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
    • ,
  • Vivian C. McAlister

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
    • ,
  • Alison R. Spouge

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, London Health Sciences Centre, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
    • ,
  • Patrick P.W. Luke

      Affiliations

    • Division of Urology, London Health Sciences Centre, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Patrick Luke, London Health Sciences Centre–University Campus, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5.

Received 22 December 2006; accepted 19 October 2007.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.

PII: S0090-4295(07)02280-7

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.030

Urology
Volume 71, Issue 3 , Pages 385-389, March 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution