« Previous
Next »
Urology
Volume 71, Issue 1
, Pages 141-145
, January 2008
Limited Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Does Not Improve Biochemical Relapse-Free Survival at 10 Years After Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
References
- Anatomical extent of lymph node dissection: impact on men with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 2004;172:1840–1844
- The association between total and positive lymph node counts, and disease progression in clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 2006;175:1320–1324
- Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results. J Urol. 2004;172:910–914
- . The incidence and extent of pelvic lymph node metastases in apparently localized prostatic cancer. Cancer. 1981;47:2941–2945
- The use of artificial intelligence technology to predict lymph node spread in men with clinically localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;88:2105–2109
- Changing patterns of pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE. J Urol. 2006;176:1382–1386
- Is a limited lymph node dissection an adequate staging procedure for prostate cancer?. J Urol. 2002;168:514–518
- Disease progression and survival of patients with positive lymph nodes after radical prostatectomy: is there a chance of cure?. J Urol. 2003;169:849–854
- Is pelvic lymph node dissection necessary in patients with a serum PSA <10 ng/ml undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer?. Eur Urol. 2006;50:272–279
- No difference in six-year biochemical failure rates with or without pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in low-risk patients with localized prostate cancer. Urology. 2004;63:528–531
- Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7005–7012
- Immediate hormonal therapy compared with observation after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with node-positive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1781–1788
- Immediate versus deferred androgen deprivation treatment in patients with node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:472–479
- Penile cancer: relation of extent of nodal metastasis to survival. J Urol. 1987;137:880–882
- . Management of invasive bladder cancer: a meticulous pelvic node dissection can make a difference. J Urol. 1982;128:34–36
- Randomized prospective evaluation of extended versus limited lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 2003;169:145–147
- The extent of lymphadenectomy for pTxN0 prostate cancer does not affect prostate cancer outcome in the prostate specific antigen era. J Urol. 2005;173:1121–1125
- Open pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: a reassessment. Urology. 1995;46:352–355
- Limited pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical prostatectomy does not affect 5-year failure rates for low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE. J Urol. 2007;177:526–529
- . Is there a need for pelvic lymph node dissection in low risk prostate cancer patients prior to definitive local therapy?. Eur Urol. 2005;47:45–50
- Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy: the 15-year Johns Hopkins experience. Urol Clin North Am. 2001;28:555–565
- Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol. 2002;167:528–534
- . Impact of extent of lymphadenectomy on survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Urology. 2006;68:121–125
- Quantitative detection of micrometastases in pelvic lymph nodes in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer by real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:1192–1197
PII: S0090-4295(07)02009-2
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.027
© 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Urology
Volume 71, Issue 1
, Pages 141-145
, January 2008
