Urology
Volume 70, Issue 1 , Pages 7-10 , July 2007

Comparison of Two Ventilation Techniques During General Anesthesia for Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: High-Frequency Jet Ventilation Versus Spontaneous Ventilation with a Laryngeal Mask Airway

Received 2 November 2006 ,Accepted 12 March 2007.

References 

  1. Sorensen C, Chandhoke P, Moore M, et al. Comparison of intravenous sedation versus general anesthesia on the efficacy of the Doli 50 lithotriptor. J Urol. 2002;168:35–37
  2. Zeitlin GL, Roth RA. Effect of three anesthetic techniques on the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in nephrolithiasis. Anesthesiology. 1988;68:272–276
  3. Burmeister M, Brauer P, Wintruff M, et al. A comparison of anesthetic techniques for shock wave lithotripsy: the use of a remifentanil infusion alone compared to intermittent fentanyl boluses combined with a low dose propofol infusion. Anesthesia. 2002;57:877–881
  4. Coloma M, Chiu JW, White PF, et al. Fast-tracking after immersion lithotripsy: general anesthesia versus monitored anesthesia care. Anesth Analg. 2000;91:92–96
  5. Warner MA, Warner ME, Buck CF, et al. Clinical efficacy of high frequency jet ventilation during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteral calculi: a comparison with conventional mechanical ventilation. J Urol. 1988;139:486–487
  6. Whelan JP, Gravenstein N, Welch JL, et al. Simulation of ventilatory-induced stone movement and its effect on stone fracture during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 1988;140:405–407

PII: S0090-4295(07)00390-1

doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.045

Urology
Volume 70, Issue 1 , Pages 7-10 , July 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution