Urology
Volume 70, Issue 1 , Pages 11-15 , July 2007

Independent Analysis of Olympus Flexible Ureteroscope Repairs

Received 1 February 2006 ,Accepted 27 February 2007.

References 

  1. Grasso M, Bagley D. Small diameter, actively deflectable, flexible ureteropyeloscopy. J Urol. 1998;160:1648–1653
  2. Monga M, Best S, Venkatesh R, et al. Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized prospective study. J Urol. 2006;176:137–141
  3. Afane JS, Olweny EO, Bercowsky E, et al. Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr. J Urol. 2000;164:1164–1168
  4. Landman J, Lee DI, Lee C, et al. Evaluation of overall costs of currently available small flexible ureteroscopes. Urology. 2003;62:218–222
  5. White MD, Moran ME. Fatigability of the latest generation of the latest generation ureteropyeloscope: Richard Wolf vs. Karl Storz. J Endourol. 1998;12:S182
  6. Sung JC, Springhart P, Marguet CG, et al. Location and etiology of flexible and semirigid ureteroscope damage. Urology. 2005;66:958–963
  7. Pietrow PK, Auge BK, Delvecchio FC, et al. Techniques to maximize flexible ureteroscope longevity. Urology. 2002;60:784–788

PII: S0090-4295(07)00296-8

doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.02.065

Urology
Volume 70, Issue 1 , Pages 11-15 , July 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution