Urology
Volume 69, Issue 3 , Pages 515-519, March 2007

Prediagnostic Prostate-Specific Antigen Velocity and Probability of Detecting High-Grade Prostate Cancer

  • Stephanie C. Krejcarek

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Stephanie Krejcarek, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115.
  • ,
  • Ming-Hui Chen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
  • ,
  • Andrew A. Renshaw

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Marian Loffredo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Brenda Sussman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Anthony V. D’Amico

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Received 4 July 2006; accepted 16 November 2006.

Objectives

Men with high-grade prostate cancer experience a survival benefit when androgen suppression therapy is combined with radiotherapy (RT) compared with RT alone. We evaluated whether an association exists between the pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity and high-grade prostate cancer at diagnosis, controlling for known predictors of high-grade disease.

Methods

The study cohort consisted of 358 men with Stage T1c-T4 prostate cancer treated with external beam RT from 1989 to 2002. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess whether an association exists between the pretreatment PSA velocity, PSA level, age, clinical T stage, and Gleason score 4+3 or greater compared with Gleason score 3+4 or less prostate cancer.

Results

Of the 358 men, 73 had a Gleason score of 4+3 or greater. The median PSA velocity was 2.71 ng/mL/yr (interquartile range 1.09 to 12.6) for men with a Gleason score of 4+3 or greater and 1.24 ng/mL/yr (interquartile range 0.71 to 3.37) for men with a Gleason score of 3+4 or less. All clinical covariates were significantly associated (P ≤ 0.05) with a Gleason score of 4+3 or greater on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, the PSA velocity (odds ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.10, P = 0.004), age (odds ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.13, P = 0.008), and clinical T stage (odds ratio 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.21 to 3.92, P = 0.01) were significantly associated with the detection of Gleason score 4+3 or greater prostate cancer.

Conclusions

The prediagnostic PSA velocity, patient age, and clinical T stage were significantly associated with high-grade prostate cancer at diagnosis. Because a biopsy Gleason score of 4+3 or greater is associated with a prostatectomy Gleason score of 7 or greater in the vast majority of cases, these parameters can identify men at high risk of harboring occult high-grade prostate cancer, permitting improved selection of RT fields and the use of androgen suppression therapy.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported, in part, by an educational grant from Astra Zeneca, Inc.

PII: S0090-4295(06)02524-6

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2006.11.009

Urology
Volume 69, Issue 3 , Pages 515-519, March 2007