Urology
Volume 69, Issue 3 , Pages 491-494 , March 2007

Tramadol Improves Patients’ Tolerance of Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy

  • Irina Hirsh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center and B. & R. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Irina Hirsh, M.D., Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, 7 Michal Street, Haifa 34362, Israel.
  • ,
  • Alexander Kaploun

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center and B. & R. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
  • ,
  • Gazy Faris

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center and B. & R. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
  • ,
  • Boaz Appel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center and B. & R. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
  • ,
  • Ilia Shneider

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center and B. & R. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
  • ,
  • Avi Stein

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center and B. & R. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
  • ,
  • Reuven Pizov

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center and B. & R. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

Received 13 May 2006 ,Accepted 24 October 2006.

References 

  1. Partin AW, Stutzman RE. Elevated prostate-specific antigen, abnormal prostate elevation on digital rectal examination, and transrectal ultrasound and prostate biopsy. Urol Clin North Am. 1998;25:581–589
  2. Clements R, Aideyan OU, Griffiths GJ, et al. Side effects and patient acceptability of transrectal biopsy of the prostate. Clin Radiol. 1993;47:125–126
  3. Collins GN, Lloyd SN, Hehier M, et al. Multiple transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies-true morbidity and patient acceptance. Br J Urol. 1993;71:460–463
  4. Striling BN, Shockley KF, Carothers GG, et al. Comparison of local anesthesia techniques during transrectal ultrasound-guide biopsies. Urology. 2002;60:80–92
  5. Irani J, Fournier F, Bon D, et al. Patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate. Br J Urol. 1997;79:608–610
  6. Autorino R, De Sio M, Di Lorenzo G, et al. How to decrease pain during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a look at the literature. J Urol. 2005;174:2091–2097
  7. Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL. Systemic five region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol. 1997;157:199–202
  8. Desgrandchamps F, Meria P, Irani J, et al. The rectal administration of lidocaine gel and tolerance of transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy of the prostate: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled study. BJU Int. 1999;83:1007–1009
  9. Masood J, Shah N, Lane T, et al. Nitrous oxide (Entonox) inhalation and tolerance of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a double-blind randomized controlled study. J Urol. 2002;168:116–120
  10. Haq A, Patel HRH, Habib MR, et al. Diclofenac suppository analgesia for transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies of the prostate: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2004;171:1489–1491
  11. Moinzadeh A, Mourtzinos A, Triaca V, et al. A randomized double-blind prospective study evaluating patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate using prebiopsy rofecoxib. J Urol. 2004;172:802–803
  12. Aus G, Dambler JE, Hugosson J. Prostate biopsy and anesthesia: an overview. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2005;39:124–129
  13. Dayer P, Collart L, Desmeules J. The pharmacology of tramadol. Drugs. 1994;47:3–7
  14. Lehmann KA. Tramadol for the management of acute pain. Drugs. 1994;47:19–32
  15. le Roux PJ, Coetzee JF. Tramadol today. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2000;13:457–461
  16. Chapman CR, Syrjala KL. Measurement of pain. In:  Loeser JD editors. Bonica’s Management of Pain. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001;p. 311–312Chapter 15
  17. Bozlu M, Atici S, Ulusoy E, et al. Periprostatic lidocaine infiltration and/or synthetic opioid (meperidine or tramadol) administration have no analgesic benefit during prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study comparing different methods. Urol Int. 2004;72:308–311
  18. Issa MM, Bux S, Chun T, et al. A randomized prospective trial of intrarectal lidocaine for pain control during transrectal prostate biopsy: the Emory University experience. J Urol. 2000;164:397–399
  19. Obek C, Ozkan B, Tunc B, et al. Comparison of 3 different methods of anesthesia before transrectal prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized trial. J Urol. 2004;172:502–505
  20. Hollabaugh RS, Dmochowski RR, Steiner MS. Neuroanatomy of the male rhabdosphincter. Urology. 1997;49:426–434
  21. Rawal N. Postoperative pain and its management. In:  Prithvi Raj P editors. Practical Management of Pain. Philadelphia: Mosby-Year Book; 1992;p. 367–390Chapter 22
  22. Lewis KS, Han NH. Tramadol: a new centrally acting analgesic. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1997;54:643–652
  23. Sunshine A. New clinical experience with tramadol. Drugs. 1994;47:8–18

 The present study was solely supported by the Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, and no extra-institutional funding was accepted.

 The authors affirm that no funding agreement limited their ability fairly to complete and publish their research, and that they had full control of primary data.

PII: S0090-4295(06)02449-6

doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.035

Urology
Volume 69, Issue 3 , Pages 491-494 , March 2007