Urology
Volume 68, Issue 6 , Pages 1156-1159, December 2006

Buccal mucosal urethroplasty in patients who had multiple previous procedures

  • Matthew D. McLaughlin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Matt D. McLaughlin, D.O., Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66106.
  • ,
  • J. Brantley Thrasher

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
  • ,
  • Andrew Celmer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
  • ,
  • Daniel Bruegger

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas

Received 21 December 2005; accepted 15 June 2006.

Abstract 

Objectives

To review the success rate of ventral onlay buccal mucosal grafts for anterior bulbar urethroplasty in patients who had undergone multiple procedures before repair.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of one surgeon’s experience performing 58 consecutive buccal mucosal urethroplasties on 57 patients from September 1999 to September 2004. The cause of the anterior urethral stricture was unknown in 33, trauma in 20, and urethritis in 4. Most of these patients had undergone multiple procedures before urethroplasty. An American Urological Association symptom score questionnaire was sent to all patients.

Results

The average patient age was 40.7 years (range 17 to 72). The average follow-up was 29.6 months (range 6 to 66). Of the 57 patients, 48 responded to the American Urological Association questionnaire (84%), and the average symptom and bother score was 4.8 and 1.3, respectively. Three patients had treatment failure, for a 94% success rate.

Conclusions

The results of this study confirm the efficacy of buccal mucosal urethroplasty for anterior urethral strictures, especially in a tertiary referral setting in which a number of our patients had undergone repeat endoscopic procedures and multiple urethral dilations.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(06)02436-8

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2006.06.031

Urology
Volume 68, Issue 6 , Pages 1156-1159, December 2006