Urology
Volume 68, Issue 6 , Pages 1152-1155, December 2006

External validation of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator in a screened population

  • Dipen J. Parekh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Dipen J. Parekh, M.D., Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229.
  • ,
  • Donna Pauler Ankerst

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas
  • ,
  • Betsy A. Higgins

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas
  • ,
  • Javier Hernandez

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas
  • ,
  • Edith Canby-Hagino

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas
  • ,
  • Timothy Brand

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas
  • ,
  • Dean A. Troyer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas
  • ,
  • Robin J. Leach

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas
    • Department of Cellular and Structural Biology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas
  • ,
  • Ian M. Thompson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas

Received 27 September 2006; accepted 19 October 2006.

Abstract 

Objectives

To evaluate the recently developed Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) prostate cancer risk calculator in the San Antonio Center of Biomarkers of Risk for Prostate Cancer (SABOR) cohort of the Early Detection Research Network, a younger and more ethnically diverse population than that in the PCPT.

Methods

From 3488 SABOR participants, we identified 446 who had undergone prostate biopsy and had undergone prostate-specific antigen measurement and digital rectal examination before biopsy. Most biopsies were performed for abnormal digital rectal examination findings, a prostate-specific antigen level of more than 2.5 ng/mL, or elevated risk because of a first-degree relative with prostate cancer. We evaluated the operating characteristics of the PCPT calculator for detecting prostate cancer in this cohort of SABOR participants. Of the 446 men in this cohort, 24% were younger than 55 years of age.

Results

Of the 446 men who had undergone biopsy, 148 (33.2%) had prostate cancer. The observed SABOR prostate cancer rates increased with increasing PCPT risk: 15.7%, 39.0%, 48.8%, and 100.0% for a PCPT risk calculator value of less than 25%, 25% to 50%, 50% to 75%, and greater than 75%, respectively. The PCPT risk calculator had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 65.5% (95% confidence interval 60.2% to 70.8%, P <0.0001), was greater in African-American men (area under curve of 80.0%, 95% confidence interval 67.8% to 92.2%) than in other races (P = 0.02), and was not different in Hispanic men (P >0.05).

Conclusions

The results of our study have shown that the PCPT risk calculator, available from the Internet and incorporating the current best panel of risk factors, is valid in other, more diverse, populations.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This investigation was supported in part by National Cancer Institute U01-CA86402 and the Early Detection Research Network.

PII: S0090-4295(06)02434-4

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.022

Urology
Volume 68, Issue 6 , Pages 1152-1155, December 2006