Urology
Volume 69, Issue 2 , Pages 343-346, February 2007

Prostate Volume Measured Preoperatively Predicts for Organ-Confined Disease in Men with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

  • Fernando J. Bianco Jr

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
    • F. J. Bianco was supported in part by the American Foundation for Urologic Disease and a training grant (T32-82088) from the National Institutes of Health.
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Fernando J. Bianco, Jr., M.D., Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box 27, New York, NY 10021.
  • ,
  • Kozhaya N. Mallah

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • ,
  • Ruslan Korets

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • ,
  • Hedvig Hricak

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • ,
  • Peter T. Scardino

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • ,
  • Michael W. Kattan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
    • Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

Received 17 March 2006; accepted 5 October 2006.

Objectives

Imaging-measured prostate volumes are different between patients with confined and extraprostatic prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the prostate volume measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) was of incremental predictive value for organ-confined prostate cancer after considering preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, biopsy Gleason score, and clinical stage.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 1071 and 1201 consecutive patients who had undergone MRI or TRUS prostate volume measurement from 1983 to 2003. We controlled for other factors such as biopsy-derived Gleason score, preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen level, and clinical stage. Two statistical models, one incorporating MRI data and one TRUS data, were developed to predict for organ-confined prostate cancer. The models were subjected to bootstrapping by resampling 200 times to reduce bias when estimating the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

In both statistical models, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (P <0.001), biopsy Gleason score (P <0.001), and clinical stage (P <0.001) were significant predictors for organ-confined prostate cancer. The MRI volume (P <0.001) and TRUS volume (P <0.001) were incremental predictors in their respective models. However, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve increase was 1% and 2% for TRUS and MRI, respectively.

Conclusions

The preoperative volume of the prostate measured by either MRI or TRUS can be used to predict for organ-confined prostate cancer. However, the value of adding the prostate volume as a variable on its own to the prediction model is limited.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported primarily by the P50-CA92629 SPORE in Prostate Cancer grant from the National Cancer Institute. Additional support came from a gift from the Koch Foundation, Prostate Cancer Foundation, and Leon Lowenstein Foundation.

PII: S0090-4295(06)02343-0

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.006

Urology
Volume 69, Issue 2 , Pages 343-346, February 2007