Urology
Volume 68, Issue 3, Supplement , Pages 26-37, September 2006

Erectile function and assessments of erection hardness correlate positively with measures of emotional well-being, sexual satisfaction, and treatment satisfaction in men with erectile dysfunction treated with sildenafil citrate (Viagra®)

  • Francesco Montorsi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Università Vita e Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
    • Francesco Montorsi and Harin Padma-Nathan are paid consultants to, and study investigators partially funded by, Pfizer Inc.
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Francesco Montorsi, MD, Department of Urology, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20132, Italy.
  • ,
  • Harin Padma-Nathan

      Affiliations

    • Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
    • Francesco Montorsi and Harin Padma-Nathan are paid consultants to, and study investigators partially funded by, Pfizer Inc.
  • ,
  • Sidney Glina

      Affiliations

    • Instituto H. Ellis, São Paulo, Brazil.
    • Sidney Glina is a member of the medical advisory board for, and paid consultant to, Pfizer Inc.

Abstract 

We aimed to determine whether erectile function (EF) and assessments of erection hardness correlate positively with measures of psychosocial outcomes (ie, emotional well-being, sexual satisfaction, and satisfaction with erectile dysfunction [ED] treatment) in men treated with sildenafil citrate (Viagra®; Pfizer Inc, New York, NY). Data were collected from 33 worldwide phase 2, 3, and 4 sildenafil clinical trials, which included almost 10,000 men with ED. Most of these trials were randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled (n = 27) and were undertaken to assess doses of 50 mg adjustable to 25 mg or 100 mg, depending on efficacy and tolerability (n = 32). Doses were taken approximately 1 hour before anticipated sexual activity but not more often than once daily. EF was assessed with use of the EF domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and with assessments of erection hardness (Erection Hardness Grading Scale [EHGS] and IIEF Q2 [the frequency of erections hard enough for penetration]). Change (baseline to end point) in emotional well-being in men treated for ED was assessed with the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) questionnaire, which consisted of the Confidence domain (ie, the Self-Esteem subscale and Overall Relationship subscale) and the Sexual Relationship domain. End point treatment satisfaction (overall, speed of onset, and duration of action) was assessed with the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS). The IIEF was used to assess change and end point sexual satisfaction by means of the Intercourse Satisfaction domain, Q7 (frequency of satisfactory sexual intercourse), and the Overall Satisfaction domain (ie, Q13, satisfaction with sex life, and Q14, satisfaction with sexual relationship). In men treated with sildenafil for ED, scores for measures of EF (IIEF EF domain, IIEF Q2) and the percentage of erections graded completely hard and fully rigid (EHGS grade 4) correlated positively with scores for measures of psychosocial outcomes (SEAR emotional well-being, IIEF sexual satisfaction, and EDITS ED treatment satisfaction), indicating that when EF improved and erection hardness increased, these measures of psychosocial function also improved.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(06)00892-2

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2006.06.027

Urology
Volume 68, Issue 3, Supplement , Pages 26-37, September 2006