Urology
Volume 68, Issue 4 , Pages 747-750 , October 2006

Maintaining urine production and early allograft function during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

Received 17 August 2005 ,Accepted 7 April 2006.

References 

  1. Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho E, et al. Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg. 1997;226:483–489
  2. Nguyen NT, Perez RV, Fleming N, et al. Effect of prolonged pneumoperitoneum on intraoperative urine output during laparoscopic gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:476–483
  3. Nogueira JM, Cangro CB, Fink JC, et al. A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation. 1999;67:722–728
  4. Carlier M, Squifflet JP, Pirson Y, et al. Maximal hydration during anesthesia increases pulmonary arterial pressures and improves early function of human renal transplants. Transplantation. 1982;34:201–204
  5. London ET, Ho HS, Neuhaus AM, et al. Effect of intravascular volume expansion on renal function during prolonged CO2 pneumoperitoneum. Ann Surg. 2000;231:195–201
  6. Chiu AW, Chang LS, Birkett DH, et al. The impact of pneumoperitoneum, pneumoretroperitoneum and gasless laparoscopy on the systemic and renal hemodynamics. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;181:397–406
  7. Dunn MD, McDougall EM. Renal physiology: laparoscopic considerations. Urol Clin North Am. 2000;27:609–614
  8. Kirsch AJ, Hensle TW, Chang DT, et al. Renal effects of CO2 insufflation: oliguria and acute renal dysfunction in a rat pneumoperitoneum model. Urology. 1994;43:453–459
  9. McDougall EM, Monk TG, Wolf JS, et al. The effect of prolonged pneumoperitoneum on renal function in an animal model. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;182:317–328
  10. Ibrahim S, Jacobs F, Zukin Y, et al. Immunohistochemical manifestations of unilateral kidney ischemia. Clin Transpl. 1996;10:646–652
  11. Shoskes DA, Parfrey NA, Halloran PF. Increased major histocompatibility complex antigen expression in unilateral ischemic acute tubular necrosis in the mouse. Transplantation. 1990;49:201–207
  12. Hazebroek EJ, de Bruin RW, Bouvy ND, et al. Long-term impact of pneumoperitoneum used for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy on renal function and histomorphology in donor and recipient rats. Ann Surg. 2003;237:351–357
  13. Goel MC, Modlin CS, Mottoo AM, et al. Fate of donor kidney: laparoscopic versus open technique. J Urol. 2004;172:2326–2330
  14. Koffron A, Herman C, Gross O, et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: analysis of donor and recipient outcomes. Transplant Proc. 2001;33:1111
  15. London E, Rudich S, McVicar J, et al. Equivalent renal allograft function with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy. Transplant Proc. 1999;31:258–260
  16. Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR, Su LM, et al. Improved recipient results after five years of performing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transplant Proc. 2001;33:1108–1110
  17. Ojo AO, Wolfe RA, Held PJ, et al. Delayed graft function: risk factors and implications for renal allograft survival. Transplantation. 1997;63:968–974
  18. Kwon OJ, Ha MK, Kwak JY, et al. The impact of delayed graft function on graft survival in living donor kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2003;35:92–93
  19. Perez J, Taura P, Rueda J, et al. Role of dopamine in renal dysfunction during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1297–1301
  20. Sasaki TM, Finelli F, Bugarin E, et al. Is laparoscopic donor nephrectomy the new criterion standard?. Arch Surg. 2000;135:943–947

PII: S0090-4295(06)00601-7

doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.04.010

Urology
Volume 68, Issue 4 , Pages 747-750 , October 2006

Article Tools