Urology
Volume 66, Issue 5 , Pages 1043-1047, November 2005

Predictors of prostate cancer after initial diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation at 10 to 12 core biopsies

  • Vincenzo Scattoni

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, “Vita-Salute” University, School of Medicine, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Vincenzo Scattoni, M.D., Department of Urology, “Vita-Salute” University, Scientific Institute H. San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20132, Italy.
  • ,
  • Marco Roscigno

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, “Vita-Salute” University, School of Medicine, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Massimo Freschi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, “Vita-Salute” University, School of Medicine, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Alberto Briganti

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, “Vita-Salute” University, School of Medicine, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Gemma Viola Fantini

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, “Vita-Salute” University, School of Medicine, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Roberto Bertini

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, “Vita-Salute” University, School of Medicine, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Andrea Salonia

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, “Vita-Salute” University, School of Medicine, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Francesco Montorsi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, “Vita-Salute” University, School of Medicine, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Patrizio Rigatti

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, “Vita-Salute” University, School of Medicine, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy

Received 23 November 2004; accepted 5 May 2005.

Abstract 

Objectives

To evaluate the factors that predict prostate cancer detection by means of 10 to 12 core repeat biopsies in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) results on initial biopsy.

Methods

From 1998 to 2004, 110 of 127 patients (87%) with a diagnosis of ASAP were rebiopsied with the same technique plus additional biopsies on the ASAP site (12.6 ± 1.1 cores [mean ± standard deviation]). Each histologic slide was reviewed blindly by a single experienced pathologist, who also differentiated highly suspicious (ASAPH) and not highly suspicious (ASAPB) lesions for cancer.

Results

On initial biopsy, a concomitant high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) was present in 26 patients (23%) with ASAP. The overall cancer detection rate was significantly higher in patients who had ASAP associated with HGPIN (58%), compared with patients who had isolated ASAP (35%; P = 0.04). The cancer detection rate was not significantly higher in patients with ASAPH than in those with ASAPB (49% versus 33%, respectively; P = 0.11). In the group of patients who had isolated ASAP, the rate of cancer detection was significantly higher in patients who had a prostatic volume less than 50 mL (56%) than in patients with a prostatic volume of 50 mL or more (27%; P = 0.03).

Conclusions

The cancer detection rate was significantly higher in patients with an ASAP associated with HGPIN on initial biopsy than in patients with isolated ASAP. In ASAP patients, the detection rate was lower for patients with a larger prostate than in those with a smaller prostate.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(05)00643-6

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.006

Urology
Volume 66, Issue 5 , Pages 1043-1047, November 2005