Urology
Volume 65, Issue 3 , Pages 600-603 , March 2005

Canine model of surgical stress response comparing standard laparoscopic, microlaparoscopic, and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy

  • Brian Yoder

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
    • Department of Urology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • ,
  • J. Stuart Wolf Jr

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
    • Department of Urology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: J. Stuart Wolf, Jr., M.D., Section of Urology, University of Michigan Medical Center, 3875 Taubman Center, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0330

Received 9 August 2004 ,Accepted 8 October 2004.

References 

  1. Karayiannakis AJ , Makri GG , Mantzioka A , et al.   Systemic stress response after laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy (a randomized trial) . Br J Surg . 1997;84:467–471
  2. Bozkurt P , Kaya G , Altintas F , et al.   Systemic stress response during operations for acute abdominal pain performed via laparoscopy or laparotomy in children . Anaesthesia . 2000;55:5–9
  3. Ortega AE , Peters JH , Incarbone R , et al.   A prospective randomized comparison of the metabolic and stress hormonal responses of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy . J Am Coll Surg . 1996;183:249–256
  4. Marcovich R , Williams AL , Seifman BD , et al.   A canine model to assess the biochemical stress response to laparoscopic and open surgery . J Endourol . 2001;15:1005–1008
  5. Miyake H , Kawabata G , Gotoh A , et al.   Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopy and open surgery in the field of urology by measurement of humoral mediators . Int J Urol . 2002;9:329–333
  6. Nelson CP , Wolf JS . Comparison of hand assisted versus standard laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for suspected renal cell carcinoma . J Urol . 2002;167:1989–1994
  7. Risquez F , Pennehoaut G , McCorvey R , et al.   Diagnostic and operative microlaparoscopy (a preliminary multicentre report) . Hum Reprod . 1997;12:1645–1648
  8. Demco L . Complications of microlaparoscopy and awake laparoscopy . J Soc Laparoendosc Surg . 2003;7:141–145
  9. Tiras MB , Gokce O , Noyan V , et al.   Comparison of microlaparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy for tubal sterilization under local anesthesia with mild sedation . J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc . 2001;8:385–388
  10. Garcia FA , Steinmetz I , Barker B , et al.   Economic and clinical outcomes of microlaparoscopic and standard laparoscopic sterilization (a comparison) . J Reprod Med . 2000;45:372–376
  11. Wang CJ , Yen CF , Lee CL , et al.   Minilaparoscopic cystectomy and appendectomy in late second trimester . J Soc Laparoendosc Surg . 2002;6:373–375
  12. Vara-Thorbeck C , Toscano R , Felices M . Preperitoneal hernioplasty performed with needlescopic instruments (microlaparoscopy) . Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Techn . 1999;9:190–193
  13. Gill IS , Soble JJ , Sung GT , et al.   Needlescopic adrenalectomy—the initial series (comparison with conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy) . Urology . 1999;52:180–186
  14. Mazdisnian F , Palmieri A , Hakakha B , et al.   Office microlaparoscopy for female sterilization under local anesthesia (a cost and clinical analysis) . J Reprod Med . 2002;47:97–100

 This study was supported by a grant from the Minimally Invasive Surgery Committee, University of Michigan.

PII: S0090-4295(04)01218-X

doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.10.021

Urology
Volume 65, Issue 3 , Pages 600-603 , March 2005

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution