Urology
Volume 64, Issue 5 , Pages 871-875, November 2004

Botulinum toxin a has antinociceptive effects in treating interstitial cystitis

  • Christopher P. Smith

      Affiliations

    • Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
    • C. P. Smith, P. Radziszewski, and M. B. Chancellor are paid consultants to Allergan, Inc., the manufacturer of a product mentioned in this article.
  • ,
  • Piotr Radziszewski

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Warsaw School of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
    • C. P. Smith, P. Radziszewski, and M. B. Chancellor are paid consultants to Allergan, Inc., the manufacturer of a product mentioned in this article.
  • ,
  • Andrzej Borkowski

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Warsaw School of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
  • ,
  • George T. Somogyi

      Affiliations

    • Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • Timothy B. Boone

      Affiliations

    • Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • Michael B. Chancellor

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Michael B. Chancellor, M.D., Departments of Urology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 700 LS Kaufmann Building, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
    • C. P. Smith, P. Radziszewski, and M. B. Chancellor are paid consultants to Allergan, Inc., the manufacturer of a product mentioned in this article.

Received 7 April 2004; accepted 15 June 2004.

Abstract 

Objectives

To present clinical evidence with botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) suggesting an antinociceptive role in patients with interstitial cystitis (IC). Intriguing evidence in a somatic pain model has suggested that BTX-A injection may have an antinociceptive effect on both acute and chronic (inflammatory) pain.

Methods

Thirteen female patients (6 in the United States and 7 in Poland) with IC according to the criteria of the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Disease were included. Under short general anesthesia or sedation, 100 to 200 U of Dysport (Polish patients) or Botox (U.S. patients) was injected through a cystoscope into 20 to 30 sites submucosally in the trigone and floor of the bladder. Patients were evaluated with the O’Leary-Sant validated IC questionnaire or with voiding charts and a visual analog pain scale 1 month postoperatively and at subsequent 3-month intervals. The Polish patients also underwent pretreatment and post-treatment urodynamic evaluations.

Results

Overall, 9 (69%) of 13 patients noted subjective improvement after BTX-A treatment. The Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index and Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index mean scores improved by 71% and 69%, respectively (P <0.05). Daytime frequency, nocturia, and pain by visual analog scale decreased by 44%, 45%, and 79%, respectively (P <0.01). The first desire to void and maximal cystometric capacity increased by 58% and 57%, respectively (P <0.01).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that BTX-A has an antinociceptive effect on bladder afferent pathways in patients with IC, producing both symptomatic and functional (ie, urodynamic) improvements.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by the Scott Department of Urology, Neurourology Fund, and the Fishbein Family CURE-IC (the funding sources had no involvement in the study method or data collection, analysis, or interpretation).

PII: S0090-4295(04)00952-5

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.073

Urology
Volume 64, Issue 5 , Pages 871-875, November 2004