Urology
Volume 64, Issue 2 , Pages 302-305 , August 2004

Can the outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate be predicted preoperatively?

  • E.Arzu Kanik

      Affiliations

    • Department ofBiostatistics, Mersin University School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: E. Arzu Kanik, Ph.D., Department of Biostatistics, University of Mersin School of Medicine, Mersin 33169, Turkey
  • ,
  • Erim Erdem

      Affiliations

    • Department ofUrology, Mersin University School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey
  • ,
  • Deniz Abidinoglu

      Affiliations

    • Department ofUrology, Mersin University School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey
  • ,
  • Deniz Acar

      Affiliations

    • Department ofUrology, Mersin University School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey
  • ,
  • Erdem Akbay

      Affiliations

    • Department ofUrology, Mersin University School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey
  • ,
  • Ercument Ulusoy

      Affiliations

    • Department ofUrology, Mersin University School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey

Received 28 January 2004 ,Accepted 22 March 2004.

References 

  1. Kuo HC. Clinical prostate score for diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction by prostate measurements and uroflowmetry. Urology. 1999;54:90–96
  2. Rodrigues P, Lucon AM, Freire GC, et al.  Urodynamic pressure flow studies can predict the clinical outcome after transurethral prostatic resection. J Urol. 2001;165:499–502
  3. Yalla SV, Sullivan MV, Lacamvasam HS, et al.  Correlation of American Urological Association symptom index with obstructive and nonobstructive prostatism. J Urol. 1995;153:674–679
  4. Kaplan SA, Bowers DL, Te AE, et al.  Differential diagnosis of prostatism (a 12 year retrospective analysis of symptoms, urodynamics and satisfaction with therapy). J Urol. 1996;155:1305–1308
  5. Bruskewitz RC, Larsen EH, Madson PO, et al.  3-year follow-up of urinary symptoms after transurethral resection of prostate. J Urol. 1986;136:613–615
  6. Neal DE, Ramsden PD, Sharpes L, et al.  Outcome of elective prostatectomy. BMJ. 1989;299:762–767
  7. van Venrooij GE, van Melick HH, and Boon TA: Comparison of outcomes of transurethral prostate resection in urodynamically obstructed versus selected urodynamically unobstructed or equivocal men. Urology 62: 672–676, 2003
  8. Griffiths DJ, Höfner K, van Mastring R, et al.  Standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function (pressure-flow studies of voiding, urethral resistance and urethral obstruction). Neurourol Urodyn. 1997;16:1–5
  9. Thompson ML. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of a sequence of tests. Biostatistics. 2003;4:341–351
  10. Dawson B, Trapp RGM. Basic & Clinical Biostatistics, Methods of Evidence-Based Medicine (ROC Curves. International Edition). Singapore: McGraw-Hill; 2001; p 274
  11. Shapiro DE. The interpretation of diagnostic tests. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:113–134
  12. Etzioni R, Kooperberg C, Pepe M, et al.  Combining biomarkers to detect disease with application to prostate cancer. Biostatistics. 2003;4:523–538
  13. Pepe MS, Thompson ML. Combining diagnostic test results to increase accuracy. Biostatistics. 2000;1:123–140
  14. Johnson RA. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Part IV (Classification and Grouping Techniques: Discrimination and Classification). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1982; p 461
  15. Jensen K, Bruskewitz RC, Irvesen P, et al.  Significance of prostatic weight in prostatism. Urol Int. 1983;38:173–178
  16. Bosch JHL. Post void residual urine in the evaluation of men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. World J Urol. 1995;13:17–22
  17. Elbadawi A, Yalla SV, Resnick NM. Structural basis of geriatric voiding dysfunction. IV (bladder outlet obstruction). J Urol. 1993;150:1681–1695
  18. Witjes WPJ, Aarnink RG, Ezz-El-Din H, et al.  The correlation between prostate volume, transition zone volume, transition zone index and clinical and urodynamic investigations in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. BJU Int. 1997;80:84–90
  19. Abrams P, Bruskewitz R, de la Rosette J, et al.  The diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction (urodynamics). In:  Cockett ATK,  Khoury S,  Aso Y, et al. editor. Proceedings of the Third International Consultation on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), Monaco, June 26–28, 1995. Monaco: Science Communication International; 1996;p. 297–367
  20. Hakenberg OW, Pinnock CB, Marshall VR. Preoperative urodynamic and symptom evaluation of patients undergoing transurethral prostatectomy (analysis of variables relevant for outcome). BJU Int. 2003;91:375–379
  21. van Venroij GEPM, van Melick HME, Eckhard MD, et al.  Correlations of urodynamic changes in symptoms and well being after transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol. 2002;168:605–609
  22. Javle P, Jenkins SA, Machin DG, et al.  Grading of benign prostatic obstruction can predict the outcome of transurethral resection. J Urol. 1998;160:1713–1717
  23. Djavan R, Maderbascher S, Klinger C, et al.  Urodynamic assessment of patients with acute urinary retention (is treatment failure after prostatectomy predictable?). J Urol. 1997;158:1829–1833
  24. Reynard JM, Shearer RJ. Failure to void after transurethral resection of the prostate and mode of presentation. Urology. 1999;53:336–339

PII: S0090-4295(04)00407-8

doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.03.035

Urology
Volume 64, Issue 2 , Pages 302-305 , August 2004