Urology
Volume 64, Issue 2 , Pages 241-245, August 2004

Management of nephropleural fistula after supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy1

  • Costas D Lallas

      Affiliations

    • Comprehensive Kidney Stone Center,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina,USA
  • ,
  • Fernando C Delvecchio

      Affiliations

    • Comprehensive Kidney Stone Center,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina,USA
  • ,
  • Brian R Evans

      Affiliations

    • Comprehensive Kidney Stone Center,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina,USA
  • ,
  • Ari D Silverstein

      Affiliations

    • Comprehensive Kidney Stone Center,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina,USA
  • ,
  • Glenn M Preminger

      Affiliations

    • Comprehensive Kidney Stone Center,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina,USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Glenn M. Preminger, M.D., Division of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, White Zone, Duke South, Room 1572D, DUMC 3167, Durham, NC 27710, USA
  • ,
  • Brian K Auge

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Naval Medical Center, San Diego, California, USA

Received 29 January 2004; accepted 16 March 2004.

Abstract 

Objectives

Access to complex urinary tract pathology may require supracostal access placing patients at risk for intrathoracic complications. Our objective was to retrospectively review our experience with percutaneous renal surgery with a particular emphasis on identifying the incidence of nephropleural fistula and management of this unusual complication.

Methods

The records of 375 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous renal surgery between 1993 and 2001 were reviewed. Supracostal access was placed to address the intrarenal pathologic findings most directly in 120 (26.0%) of the 462 tracts, with 87 (18.8%) above the 12th rib, 32 (6.9%) above the 11th rib, and 1 (0.2%) above the 10th rib.

Results

Of 375 patients, 4 (1%) developed a nephropleural fistula. Of the 87 with supracostal-12th rib access, 2 (2.3%) developed a nephropleural fistula, and 2 (6.3%) of the 32 with supracostal-11th rib access developed the same complication. The overall incidence of nephropleural fistulas in our patient population per access tract placed was 0.87% (4 of 462 percutaneous tracts), which increased to 3.3% (4 of 120) when considering only supracostal access. All patients were treated conservatively, although 1 patient required thoracoscopy with decortication for persistent pleural effusion. No further sequelae developed in any of the other 3 patients, and all fistulas had resolved at 3 months of follow-up.

Conclusions

As aggressive percutaneous renal surgery with supracostal access to the collecting system becomes more common, the incidence of intrathoracic complications, including nephropleural fistula, may increase. Early recognition and management of a pleural injury is critical to avoid life-threatening situations. Low-morbidity measures are typically successful; however, more aggressive treatment may be required on occasion.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 
  • 1 The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy of the United States Navy, Department of Defense, or U.S. Government.

PII: S0090-4295(04)00351-6

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2004.03.031

Urology
Volume 64, Issue 2 , Pages 241-245, August 2004