Urology
Volume 64, Issue 2 , Pages 246-249, August 2004

Risk factors for skin breakdown after renal and adrenal surgery

  • Jennifer Stevens

      Affiliations

    • Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
  • ,
  • Erika Nichelson

      Affiliations

    • Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
  • ,
  • W.Marston Linehan

      Affiliations

    • Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
  • ,
  • Nancy Thompson

      Affiliations

    • Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
  • ,
  • David Liewehr

      Affiliations

    • Biostatistics and Data Management Section, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
  • ,
  • David Venzon

      Affiliations

    • Biostatistics and Data Management Section, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
  • ,
  • McClellan M Walther

      Affiliations

    • Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: McClellan M. Walther, M.D., Urologic Oncology Branch, DCS, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, MSC 1502, Building 10, Room 2B-43, Bethesda, MD 20892-1502, USA

Received 10 October 2003; accepted 11 March 2004.

Abstract 

Objectives

To perform a retrospective review in patients undergoing urologic operations during a 10-year period. Patient positioning is important before surgery to avoid pressure sores and other iatrogenic injuries. The reported risk factors have included a long operative time, diabetes, and malignancy. We have noted skin breakdown in patients placed on stabilizing devices and in patients with germline von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) gene mutations (a gene important in angiogenesis).

Methods

We performed a retrospective review in patients undergoing urologic operations during a 10-year period. Patient sex, age, blood loss, position, use of belt or Vac Pac, and diagnosis of VHL were correlated with skin breakdown.

Results

During a 10-year period, 382 patients underwent primarily renal and adrenal surgery. Fifty-five patients (14.4%) developed skin breakdown after surgery. Ninety-six patients had VHL gene mutations. Patient position and operative time were both significantly related to skin breakdown (both P <0.0001). The odds ratio for the position effect indicated that patients in the lateral position were at much greater risk than patients in the supine position (estimated odds ratio 8.1, P <0.0001). The odds ratio for operative time confirmed that patients experiencing longer operative times were also at increased risk of skin breakdown (estimated odds ratio 3.7 for each doubling of the operative time, P <0.0001). Patient sex, patient age, estimated blood loss, diagnosis of VHL, and use of belt or Vac Pac were not associated with an increased risk of skin breakdown.

Conclusions

Patients with longer operative times were at greater risk of skin breakdown and required greater care during preoperative positioning. The other factors studied were not significantly associated with skin breakdown.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(04)00341-3

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2004.03.024

Urology
Volume 64, Issue 2 , Pages 246-249, August 2004