« Previous
Next »
Urology
Volume 59, Issue 6
, Pages 821-825
, June 2002
Cost comparison for laparoscopic nephrectomy and open nephrectomy: analysis of individual parameters
References
- Laparoscopic nephrectomy (initial case report). J Urol. 1991;146:278–282
- . Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal tumor (the Washington University experience). J Urol. 1996;155:1180–1185
- . Laparoscopic extirpation of renal cell cancer (feasibility, questions, and concerns). Semin Surg Oncol. 1996;12:100–112
- . A review of our first 100 cases of laparoscopic nephrectomy (defining risk factors for complications). Br J Urol. 1998;82:615–618
- Nephrectomy (a comparative study between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus the open approach). Eur Urol. 1998;33:489–496
- Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell cancer (evaluation of efficacy and safety—a multicenter experience). Urology. 1998;52:773–777
- Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (a five-year experience). Urology. 1999;53:280–286
- Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy. J Urol. 1999;161:1776–1780
- Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy (a 9-year experience). J Urol. 2000;164:1153–1159
- Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (the Cleveland clinic experience). J Urol. 2000;163:1665–1670
- Prospective, case matched comparison of hand assisted laparoscopic and open surgical live donor nephrectomy. J Urol. 2000;163:1650–1653
- . Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with a 23-hour stay (a new standard for transplantation surgery). Ann Surg. 2000;231:772–779
PII: S0090-4295(02)01611-4
© 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Urology
Volume 59, Issue 6
, Pages 821-825
, June 2002
