Urology
Volume 59, Issue 6 , Pages 861-864 , June 2002

Noncontrast computed tomography in obstructive anuria: a prospective study

  • Ahmed A Shokeir

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Ahmed A. Shokeir, M.D., Ph.D., Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
    • Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
    • ,
  • Ahmed M Shoma

      Affiliations

    • Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
    • ,
  • Ahmed Mosbah

      Affiliations

    • Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
    • ,
  • Osama Mansour

      Affiliations

    • Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
    • ,
  • Mohamed Abol-Ghar

      Affiliations

    • Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
    • ,
  • Waleed Eassa

      Affiliations

    • Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
    • ,
  • Ahmed El-Asmy

      Affiliations

    • Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

Received 6 November 2001 ,Revised 28 January 2002 ,Accepted 28 January 2002.

References 

  1. Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA, et al.  Acute flank pain (comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography). Radiology. 1995;194:789–794
  2. Dalrymple NC, Verga M, Anderson KR, et al.  The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. J Urol. 1998;159:735–740
  3. Miller OF, Rineer SK, Richard SR, et al.  Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urogram in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Urology. 1998;52:982–987
  4. Fielding JR, Steele G, Fox LA, et al.  Spiral computerized tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain (a replacement for excretory urography). J Urol. 1997;157:2071–2073
  5. Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Arslan G, et al.  Renal colic (comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi). Eur Radiol. 1998;8:212–217
  6. Vieweg J, Teh C, Freed K, et al.  Unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of patients with acute flank pain. J Urol. 1998;160:679–684
  7. Haddad MC, Sharif HS, Shaded MS, et al.  Renal colic (diagnosis and outcome). Radiology. 1992;184:83–88
  8. Mutagi A, Williams JW, Nettleman M. Renal colic (utility of the plain abdominal roentgenogram). Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:1589–1592
  9. Levine JA, Neitlich J, Verga M, et al.  Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain (correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT). Radiology. 1997;204:27–31
  10. Platt JF, Rubin JH, Ellis JH, et al.  Duplex Doppler US of the kidney (differentiation of obstructive from non-obstructive dilatation). Radiology. 1989;17:515–517
  11. Shokeir AA, Abdulmaaboud M. Resistive index in renal colic (a prospective study). BJU Int. 1999;83:378–382

PII: S0090-4295(02)01597-2

Urology
Volume 59, Issue 6 , Pages 861-864 , June 2002

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution