Urology
Volume 59, Issue 6 , Pages 856-860, June 2002

Pubovaginal sling and pelvic prolapse repair in women with occult stress urinary incontinence: effect on postoperative emptying and voiding symptoms

  • Nathalie M Barnes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
  • ,
  • Roger R Dmochowski

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  • ,
  • Royal Park

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
  • ,
  • Victor W Nitti

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Victor W. Nitti, M.D., Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, 540 First Avenue, Suite 10U, New York, NY 10016 USA
    • Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA

Received 4 October 2001; received in revised form 22 January 2002; accepted 22 January 2002.

Abstract 

Objectives. To determine the perioperative morbidity of performing a concurrent pubovaginal sling with prolapse repair in women with occult (or potential) stress incontinence, particularly on voiding dysfunction and emptying.

Methods. We reviewed the charts of 38 women with grade 3-4 pelvic prolapse and occult stress incontinence. All patients underwent video urodynamic testing with the prolapse unreduced and again with the prolapse reduced with a pessary or packing. The abdominal leak point pressure was determined. Appropriate surgical repair of all components of the prolapse was performed concurrently with pubovaginal sling placement. The outcomes were measured with respect to the time to spontaneous voiding, permanent urinary retention, development of stress incontinence or de novo urge incontinence, resolution of urge incontinence, and perioperative complications.

Results. The mean age was 72 years, and the mean follow-up was 15 months (range 6 to 39). The mean time required before spontaneous voiding resumed without the need for catheterization was 11.8 days (range 2 to 46). No patient developed permanent urinary retention. Two (9.5%) of 21 women without preoperative urge incontinence developed de novo urge incontinence. However, existing urge incontinence resolved in 45%. One woman developed a suprapubic wound infection, which resolved with conservative management. Stress incontinence occurred in 2 women (7%) at 4 and 19 months postoperatively. Clinically significant prolapse (uterine) developed in 1 patient 2 years after surgery.

Conclusions. Simultaneous pubovaginal sling placement for women with occult stress incontinence undergoing repair of a large pelvic prolapse is effective in preventing postoperative stress incontinence and has little negative effect on postoperative bladder emptying. It should be considered in all women with occult stress incontinence undergoing prolapse repair.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(02)01547-9

Urology
Volume 59, Issue 6 , Pages 856-860, June 2002