Urology
Volume 58, Issue 2 , Pages 267-270, August 2001

Outcomes of one-stage techniques for proximal hypospadias repair

  • Savaş Demi̇rbi̇lek

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Harran University Faculty of Medicine, Şanlıurfa, Turkey
    • Social Security Council, Children Hospital, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ankara, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Savaş Demirbilek, M.D., Imam Bakır Mah. Karacadağ Sok. Number 38, Ferahkent, Şanlıurfa 63300, Turkey
  • ,
  • Turan Kanmaz

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Harran University Faculty of Medicine, Şanlıurfa, Turkey
    • Social Security Council, Children Hospital, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ankara, Turkey
  • ,
  • Gazi̇ Aydin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Harran University Faculty of Medicine, Şanlıurfa, Turkey
    • Social Security Council, Children Hospital, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ankara, Turkey
  • ,
  • Selçuk Yücesan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Harran University Faculty of Medicine, Şanlıurfa, Turkey
    • Social Security Council, Children Hospital, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ankara, Turkey

Received 31 October 2000; received in revised form 23 March 2001; accepted 23 March 2001.

Abstract 

Objectives. To evaluate the success of three preputial flap techniques in the one-stage correction of proximal hypospadias.

Methods. From 1993 to 1999, 43 children underwent one-stage proximal hypospadias repair using preputial flaps, which were performed by a single surgeon. Of the 43 patients, 21 (48.8%), 10 (23.2%), and 12 (27.9%) underwent tubularized island flap urethroplasty, double-faced tubularized island flap urethroplasty, and onlay island flap urethroplasty, respectively. The age range of the patients at surgery was 18 months to 14 years (mean 3.4). Dorsal plication was required for chordee repair in 12 patients (3 in tubularized island flaps, 3 in double-faced tubularized island flaps, and 6 in onlay island flaps). In addition to the dorsal plication, posterior dissection of the urethral plate without division was performed on 3 of the 6 patients with mild to severe chordee in the onlay island flap group. The incidence of complications requiring repeated surgery was evaluated for each group.

Results. The follow-up was 8 months to 7 years (mean 4.1 years). The overall complication rate was 90% for the double-faced tubularized island flap repair, 38% for the tubularized island flap repair, and 33% for the onlay island flap repair. Recurrent chordee was observed in 2 (66.6%) of the 3 patients who underwent onlay island flap repair with urethral plate dissection.

Conclusions. The use of a tubularized island flap is suggested for one-stage repair of proximal hypospadias, especially in the patients with severe chordee. Because of the high complication rates, the double-faced tubularized island flap technique is not advocated. The onlay island flap may also be used for proximal hypospadias repair if mild chordee is present. Because of the high recurrent chordee rate, dissection of the urethral plate without division is not suggested in the onlay island flap technique.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(01)01183-9

Urology
Volume 58, Issue 2 , Pages 267-270, August 2001