Prostate cancer prevention strategies using antiproliferative or differentiating agents

  • Janet Walczak

      Affiliations

    • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA (JW, HW, MC)
  • ,
  • Hadley Wood

      Affiliations

    • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA (JW, HW, MC)
  • ,
  • George Wilding

      Affiliations

    • University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA (GW)
  • ,
  • Thomas Williams Jr

      Affiliations

    • Ilex Oncology, Inc., San Antonio, Texas, USA (TW)
  • ,
  • Charles W Bishop

      Affiliations

    • BCI Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA (CWB), USA
  • ,
  • Michael Carducci

      Affiliations

    • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA (JW, HW, MC)
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Michael Carducci, MD, Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, 1M88 Bunting Blaustein, 1650 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21231-1000

Abstract 

Differentiation or antiproliferative therapies have been most effective in the treatment of promyelocytic leukemia and are being investigated for the treatment of solid tumors including prostate cancer (PCa). Research suggests that these agents may induce terminal differentiation (arrest in G0), induce differentiation to a mature cell with cellular functions and a growth pattern similar to nonmalignant cells, or trigger apoptosis. This review focuses on classes of agents under laboratory and clinical evaluation as antiproliferative or differentiating agents: polyamine inhibitors, vitamin D and its analogs, metabolites of vitamin A, the short-chain fatty acid, phenylbutyrate, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Because differentiation therapies offer a reduced toxicity profile and have potential for preventing or slowing cancer progression, they may offer an alternative to chemotherapy for men with advanced PCa, or may be useful as low-toxicity agents given chronically for chemoprevention in men at high risk for PCa. Clinical trials are needed to define the role of these agents in primary and secondary prevention.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(00)00947-X