Urology
Volume 57, Issue 4, Supplement 1 , Pages 4-27 , April 2001

Executive Summary of the National Cancer Institute Workshop: Highlights and recommendations

  • Ronald Lieberman

      Affiliations

    • National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA (RL)
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Ronald Lieberman, MD, Prostate and Urologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, 5130 Executive Blvd. EPN 2105, Rockville, MD 20852
  • ,
  • William G Nelson

      Affiliations

    • Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA (WGN, AWP)
  • ,
  • Wael A Sakr

      Affiliations

    • Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA (WS)
  • ,
  • Frank L Meyskens Jr.

      Affiliations

    • University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California, USA (FLM)
  • ,
  • Eric A Klein

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA (EAK)
  • ,
  • George Wilding

      Affiliations

    • University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
  • ,
  • Alan W Partin

      Affiliations

    • Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA (WGN, AWP)
  • ,
  • J.Jack Lee

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA (JJL, SML)
  • ,
  • Scott M Lippman

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA (JJL, SML)

References 

  1. Report of the Chemoprevention Implementation Group, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, September 10, 1999.
  2. De Marzo AM, Putzi MJ, Nelson WG. New concepts in the pathology of prostatic epithelial carcinogenesis. Urology. 2001;57(suppl 4A):103–114
  3. Trock BJ. Validation of surrogate endpoint biomarkers in prostate cancer chemoprevention trials. Urology. 2001;57(suppl 4A):241–247
  4. Lopaczynski W, Hruszkewycz AM, Lieberman R. Preprostatectomy (a clinical model to study stromal-epithelial interactions). Urology. 2001;57(suppl 4A):194–199
  5. Weiss HL, Urban DA, Grizzle WE, et al.  Bayesian monitoring of a phase II chemoprevention trial in high risk cohorts for prostate cancer. Urology. 2001;57(suppl 4A):220–223
  6. Lee JJ, Lieberman R, Sloan JA, et al.  Design considerations for efficient prostate cancer chemoprevention trials. Urology. 2001;57(suppl 4A):205–212
  7. Gail MA, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al: Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst. 81: 1879–1886, 1989.
  8. AACR Task Force on Intraepithelial Neoplasia. AACR Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, April 2000.
  9. US Food and Drug Administration Oncology Division Advisory Committee (ODAC), Bethesda, MD, December 1999.
  10. Lieberman R. Prostate cancer chemoprevention (strategies for designing efficient clinical trials). Urology. 2001;57(suppl 4A):224–229
  11. Moul JW. Prostate-specific antigen-enhanced testing and risk stratification for chemoprevention trials. Urology. 2001;57(suppl 4A):174–177

PII: S0090-4295(00)00931-6

Urology
Volume 57, Issue 4, Supplement 1 , Pages 4-27 , April 2001