Urology
Volume 65, Issue 4 , Pages 773-777, April 2005

Effect of neonatal circumcision on penile neurologic sensation

  • Clifford B. Bleustein

      Affiliations

    • Urology Specialty Care, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
    • A. Melman and C. Bleustein are owners of Neurotest, LLC.
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Clifford Bleustein, M.D., Urology Specialty Care, P.A., 630 East Palisade Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632.
  • ,
  • James D. Fogarty

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
  • ,
  • Haftan Eckholdt

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, Yeshiva University Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
  • ,
  • Joseph C. Arezzo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, Yeshiva University Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
    • Department of Neuroscience, Yeshiva University Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
  • ,
  • Arnold Melman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
    • A. Melman and C. Bleustein are owners of Neurotest, LLC.

Received 20 September 2004; accepted 3 November 2004.

Abstract 

Objectives

To evaluate penile sensory thresholds in neonatally circumcised and uncircumcised men.

Methods

We evaluated 125 patients, 62 uncircumcised men and 63 neonatally circumcised men. All patients completed the Erectile Function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire. Of the 125 patients, 29 (International Index of Erectile Function score of between 25 and 30) were placed in the functional group, and 96 in the dysfunctional group. The patients were tested on the dorsal midline glans of the penis (foreskin retracted). Quantitative somatosensory testing was performed and included vibration, pressure, spatial perception, and warm and cold thermal thresholds.

Results

In the functional group, t-test analysis demonstrated a significant (P <0.001) difference, with worse vibration and better pressure sensation for uncircumcised men. When controlling for age, hypertension, and diabetes, all t-test significance was lost. In the dysfunctional group, circumcised men (49 ± 16 years) were significantly younger (P <0.01) than uncircumcised men (56 ± 13 years). For the dysfunctional group, t-test analysis also demonstrated worse vibration sensation for uncircumcised men (P <0.01). Again, when controlling for age, hypertension, and diabetes, all t-test significance was lost.

Conclusions

We present a comparative analysis of uncircumcised and circumcised men using a battery of quantitative somatosensory tests that evaluate the spectrum of small to large axon nerve fiber function. Our study controlled for factors, including age, erectile function status, diabetes, and hypertension, that have been shown to alter neurologic testing. In our study of neonatally circumcised men, we demonstrated that circumcision status does not significantly alter the quantitative somatosensory testing results at the glans penis.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(04)01343-3

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2004.11.007

Urology
Volume 65, Issue 4 , Pages 773-777, April 2005